Title
Yu vs. National Labor Relations Commission
Case
G.R. No. 97212
Decision Date
Jun 30, 1993
Benjamin Yu, hired by Jade Mountain, sued for unpaid wages after partnership ownership changed. Court ruled new partnership liable for old debts, awarded Yu unpaid wages, separation pay, moral damages, and attorney's fees.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 107653)

Facts:

  • Formation and nature of employment
    • Jade Mountain Products Company Limited (“Jade Mountain”) organized June 28, 1984 as a partnership exploiting a marble deposit in Bulacan, with general partners Lea and Rhodora Bendal and limited partners Chiu Shian Jeng, Chen Ho-Fu, and Yu Chang.
    • Partnership office in Makati; entered Memorandum Agreement (June 26, 1984) with landowners Sps. Ricardo and Guillermina Cruz.
  • Engagement and duties of petitioner
    • By Partnership Resolution (March 14, 1985), Benjamin Yu hired as Assistant General Manager at a P4,000 monthly salary, though received only P2,000 pending additional funds.
    • Yu managed quarry operations, supervised workers, prepared export documents, and controlled finances.
  • Change of partnership membership and treatment of Yu
    • In 1987–1988 original general partners sold interests to Willy Co and Emmanuel Zapanta, transferring 82% of partnership shares and relocating the office to Mandaluyong while retaining the “Jade Mountain” name.
    • On November 16, 1987 Yu reported to the new Mandaluyong office; met Willy Co who refused to assume old partnership obligations and barred Yu from work, leaving his unpaid salaries unpaid.
  • Administrative proceedings
    • December 21, 1988, Yu filed before the Labor Arbiter a complaint for illegal dismissal, recovery of unpaid salaries (Nov 1984–Oct 1988), moral and exemplary damages, and attorney’s fees.
    • Labor Arbiter ruled in favor of Yu, ordering reinstatement, backwages, and attorney’s fees.
    • On appeal the NLRC (Nov 29, 1990) reversed, finding the new partnership need not absorb old employees and that unpaid wages should be claimed against original partners.
  • Petition for certiorari
    • Yu elevated the case to the Supreme Court, arguing that partnership’s juridical personality persists despite membership changes and binds successor partnership to employment obligations.

Issues:

  • Whether the original partnership was extinguished and replaced by a new partnership consisting of Willy Co and Emmanuel Zapanta.
  • If a new partnership exists, whether Yu may enforce his employment contract rights (unpaid salaries, protection against dismissal) against it.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.