Title
Yoshimura vs. Panagsagan
Case
A.C. No. 10962
Decision Date
Sep 11, 2018
A lawyer is disbarred for grave misconduct, misappropriation of funds, and fraudulent acts after failing to fulfill his obligations and account for money received from a client, as well as convincing the client to join a defunct cooperative.
Font Size

Case Digest (A.C. No. 10962)

Facts:

  • Case: Akira Yoshimura vs. Atty. Bernie Panagsagan, A.C. No. 10962
  • Date: Decided on September 11, 2018
  • Complainant: Akira Yoshimura
  • Respondent: Atty. Bernie Panagsagan
  • Allegation: Grave misconduct
  • Events:
    • In 2009, Yoshimura and his common-law wife, Bernadette Tugadi, sought legal assistance from Atty. Panagsagan.
    • They aimed to facilitate Bernadette's membership in the Lesambah Transport Cooperative and register their buses.
    • Various sums were given to Atty. Panagsagan for professional fees and services:
      • P5,000 for document preparation
      • P24,000 for apprehension tickets
      • P40,000 as "under the table" money to expedite registration
    • Despite payments, services were not rendered, and license plates were not issued.
    • Atty. Panagsagan convinced Yoshimura to join the non-operational Sta. Monica Transport Cooperative, leading to further financial losses.
    • Atty. Panagsagan refused to return the money when demanded by Yoshimura.
    • Yoshimura filed a complaint for disciplinary action.
    • Atty. Panagsagan failed to respond or attend hearings.
    • The IBP-CBD recommended disbarment, which the IBP-Board of Governors adopted.
    • The Supreme Court reviewed and sustained the findings.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • Yes, Atty. Bernie Panagsagan committed grave misconduct, misappropriated funds, and engaged in fraudulent acts.
  • Yes, Atty. Bernie Pa...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • Grave Misconduct: Atty. Panagsagan's actions constituted grave misconduct and a blatant disregard for fiduciary duties.
  • Violation of Canon 16: He failed to account for and return the monies received from Yoshimura, violating Canon 16 of the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR).
  • Unethical Behavior: Acceptance of "under the table" money and misrepresentation regarding the Sta. Monica Transport Cooperative demonstrated dishonest and unethical behavior.
  • Notarial Law Violation: He notarized documents without the personal appearance of the affiants.
  • Non-compliance: Repeated failure to comply with IBP directives and attend hearings s...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.