Title
Vivares vs. St. Theresa's College
Case
G.R. No. 202666
Decision Date
Sep 29, 2014
Minors' Facebook photos, shared with "Friends Only" privacy, accessed by school for disciplinary action. Supreme Court ruled no privacy violation, upholding school's authority to enforce policies.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 202666)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Context
    • Petitioners: Rhonda Ave S. Vivares and Spouses Margarita and David Suzara, parents of minor students Julia and Julienne Suzara.
    • Respondents: St. Theresa’s College (STC), computer teacher Mylene Rheza T. Escudero, and John Does.
  • Circumstances of the Photographs
    • January 2012: Minors Julia Daluz and Julienne Suzara and classmates took digital photos in undergarments before changing into swimsuits at a beach party.
    • Angela Lindsay Tan uploaded these images to her Facebook profile; privacy setting allegedly “Friends Only.”
  • Discovery and School Disciplinary Action
    • Escudero learned of photos via students, accessed them on STC computers, and showed them to Discipline-in-Charge Kristine Rose Tigol.
    • STC investigation found violations of Student Handbook (alcohol, smoking, indecent acts, improper apparel, online exposure).
    • Sanction: barred from commencement exercises scheduled March 30, 2012.
  • Parallel Injunction and TRO Proceedings
    • March 23, 2012: Dr. Armenia M. Tan filed for injunction to allow Angela to attend graduation; Vivares intervened on March 25.
    • March 28, 2012: RTC issued TRO permitting attendance; STC defied TRO citing pending motion for reconsideration.
  • Habeas Data Petition
    • Petition filed in SP. Proc. No. 19251-CEB arguing unauthorized access and copying of private Facebook data violated minors’ informational privacy.
    • RTC issued writ of habeas data (July 5, 2012); respondents filed return denying improper access, disputing reasonable expectation of privacy, and claiming forum-shopping.
    • RTC Decision (July 27, 2012) dismissed the petition for lack of proven violation and because photos were publicly viewable.

Issues:

  • Primary Issue
    • Whether an actual or threatened violation of the minors’ right to informational privacy occurred, justifying issuance of the writ of habeas data.
  • Subsidiary Questions
    • Whether the writ of habeas data extends beyond extralegal killings and enforced disappearances.
    • Whether STC qualifies as an entity “engaged in the gathering, collecting or storing of data.”
    • Whether Facebook users have a reasonable expectation of privacy when using privacy settings.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.