Case Digest (G.R. No. 162230)
Facts:
Isabelita C. Vinuya et al. v. The Honorable Executive Secretary Alberto G. Romulo et al., G.R. No. 162230, April 28, 2010, the Supreme Court En Banc, Del Castillo, J., writing for the Court. Petitioners are members of Malaya Lolas, an organization of Filipinas who allege they were forced into sexual servitude as “comfort women” by the Japanese military during World War II. Respondents are the Executive Secretary Alberto G. Romulo, the Secretary of Foreign Affairs Delia Domingo-Albert, the Secretary of Justice Merceditas N. Gutierrez, and the Solicitor General Alfredo L. Benipayo. Petitioners filed an original petition for certiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court, with an application for a writ of preliminary mandatory injunction, asking the Court to declare that respondents committed grave abuse of discretion in refusing to espouse the petitioners’ claims against Japan and to compel respondents to espouse those claims internationally.Petitioners recount wartime atrocities—forced recruitment, repeated rape, physical abuse, and long-term injuries—and state they sought Executive assistance beginning in 1998 through the DOJ, DFA and OSG to prosecute or press claims against Japan and obtain official apologies and reparations. Executive officials declined, taking the position that the Philippines’ acceptance of the 1951 Treaty of Peace with Japan (and the 1956 Reparations Agreement) extinguished such claims, and noting Japan’s apologies and the Asian Women’s Fund as having addressed the matter.
The petition presents the core legal controversy to the Supreme Court without prior Philippine trial- or appellate-court adjudication because it is an original Rule 65 action challenging an alleged abuse of discretion by executive officers. The Court heard and decided the petition, dismissing it for l...(Subscriber-Only)
Issues:
- Did the Executive Department commit grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction by refusing to espouse petitioners’ claims against Japan?
- Can the Supreme Court compel the Executive to espouse and pursue petitioners’ claims for apology and reparations against Japan befo...(Subscriber-Only)
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)