Title
Villanueva vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 218652
Decision Date
Feb 23, 2022
Public officials and petitioner conspired to award contracts to petitioner's companies, violating RA 3019 through manifest partiality and bad faith.

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-46484)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background and Charge
    • Rodrigo D. Villanueva (petitioner), President and GM of AM-Europharma Corp. and sole proprietor of Mallix Drug Center, was charged with public officers (Mayor Locsin, Accountant Moreno, Budget Officer Tirador, Treasurer Figueroa, Rep. Minurtio) for violation of Sec. 3(e), RA 3019 (Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act).
    • Amended Information alleged that on January 15, 2001, in Janiuay, Iloilo, the accused unlawfully awarded P13,191,223 to Europharma and P1,744,926 to Mallix Drug despite Europharma’s suspended DOH accreditation and undisclosed common ownership by Villanueva, giving unwarranted benefit.
  • Factual Antecedents
    • Municipal government of Janiuay, under Mayor Locsin as LMP-Iloilo president, received P15 M from DOH for emergency medicines program via MOA dated December 19, 2000.
    • Invitation to Bid published; three entities responded (Europharma, Mallix Drug, Pharmawealth). Bidding postponed twice due to absence of provincial auditor.
    • January 15, 2001: Committee on Awards opened bids without auditor, recommended award to Europharma and Mallix Drug; Mayor Locsin approved, purchase orders and certificates of acceptance issued January 16; medicines delivered same day; checks issued January 17.
    • BFAD testing found P240,000 worth of cotrimoxazole defective; Mallix Drug delivered replacements only on October 16, 2001.
    • Provincial auditor’s post-audit revealed: no auditor notification, no performance bond, undisclosed Villanueva ownership, Europharma accreditation suspended.
    • Ombudsman-Visayas investigation found probable cause; petition for review on certiorari filed in Supreme Court challenging Sandiganbayan’s February 23, 2015 Decision and June 8, 2015 Resolution convicting petitioner and co-accused.

Issues:

  • Whether the Sandiganbayan convicted for offenses not stated in the Amended Information.
  • Whether conviction under COA Circular No. 92-386 is improper, as it is not penal law.
  • Whether the award was valid under “emergency procurement” doctrine.
  • Whether Sec. 368, LGC, allowed bypassing public bidding.
  • Whether LMP-Iloilo’s corporate personality barred treating actions as municipal functions.
  • Whether acceptance of Pharmawealth’s disclaimer was erroneous.
  • Whether Europharma’s pending license renewal disqualified it as bidder.
  • Whether DOH accreditation was a legal requirement for local procurement.
  • Whether piercing the corporate veil of Europharma and Mallix Drug was improper.
  • Whether conspiracy findings based on circumstantial evidence violated the equipoise doctrine.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.