Case Digest (G.R. No. 211140) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
On January 12, 2016, the Supreme Court, En Banc, decided Lord Allan Jay Q. Velasco v. Hon. Speaker Feliciano R. Belmonte, Jr., Secretary General Marilyn B. Barua-Yap and Regina Ongsiako Reyes (G.R. No. 211140) under the 1987 Constitution. In the May 13, 2013 elections for the lone district of Marinduque, petitioner Lord Allan Jay Q. Velasco (Velasco) challenged the candidacy and subsequent proclamation of respondent Regina Ongsiako Reyes (Reyes). On October 10, 2012, one Joseph Socorro Tan filed before the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) SPA No. 13-053 to cancel Reyes’s Certificate of Candidacy (COC) for material misrepresentations. The COMELEC First Division cancelled Reyes’s COC on March 27, 2013, and the full COMELEC affirmed on May 14, 2013, with finality on June 5, 2013. Despite this, the Provincial Board of Canvassers (PBOC) proclaimed Reyes on May 18, 2013. Velasco then filed election-related petitions before the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET) and qu Case Digest (G.R. No. 211140) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Background of the 2013 Marinduque Congressional Race
- May 13, 2013 elections: Lord Allan Jay Q. Velasco (Velasco) and Regina Ongsiako Reyes (Reyes) ran for Representative, Lone District of Marinduque.
- Initial canvass: Reyes received more votes and was proclaimed by the Provincial Board of Canvassers (PBOC) on May 18, 2013.
- COMELEC Proceedings on Reyes’s Eligibility
- October 10, 2012 – Joseph Socorro Tan filed SPA No. 13-053 before the COMELEC First Division to cancel Reyes’s Certificate of Candidacy (CoC) for material misrepresentations (citizenship, residency, birthdate, etc.).
- March 27, 2013 – COMELEC First Division granted Tan’s petition and cancelled Reyes’s CoC.
- May 14, 2013 – COMELEC en banc affirmed the cancellation; the ruling became final and executory on May 19, 2013 (no Supreme Court restraining order sought).
- Actions of the Provincial Board of Canvassers
- May 15 & 16, 2013 – COMELEC designee and Reyes’s counsel received copy of the en banc resolution cancelling her CoC.
- May 18, 2013 – Despite that, Marinduque PBOC proclaimed Reyes as winner.
- Further COMELEC Actions and HRET Filings
- May 31, 2013 – Velasco filed an Election Protest Ad Cautelam (HRET No. 13-028); Christopher Matienzo filed a Quo Warranto Ad Cautelam (HRET No. 13-027) before the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET).
- June 5, 2013 – COMELEC en banc issued a Certificate of Finality for SPA No. 13-053, declaring its May 14 ruling “final and executory.”
- Reyes’s Oath, Assumption, and Judicial Challenges
- June 7, 2013 – Speaker Belmonte administered the oath to Reyes.
- June 10, 2013 – Reyes filed certiorari (G.R. No. 207264) contesting COMELEC’s May 14 ruling and the Certificate of Finality.
- June 30, 2013 – Reyes assumed office at noon and began congressional duties.
- Reversal of Proclamation; New Proclamation of Velasco
- July 9, 2013 – On reconsideration in SPC No. 13-010, COMELEC en banc declared Reyes’s proclamation null and void and proclaimed Velasco as the duly elected Representative.
- July 10, 2013 – COMELEC granted enforcement of SPA No. 13-053, reconstituted the PBOC, and directed it to proclaim Velasco.
- July 16, 2013 – Newly constituted PBOC proclaimed Velasco with 48,396 votes.
- Finality of Judicial Rulings
- October 22, 2013 – Supreme Court dismissed Reyes’s certiorari petition (G.R. No. 207264) for lack of merit; affirmed COMELEC’s cancellation of her CoC.
- December 14, 2015 – HRET dismissed all remaining quo warranto petitions against Reyes for lack of jurisdiction, citing finality of the Supreme Court’s ruling in G.R. No. 207264.
Issues:
- Does Velasco have a well-defined, clear legal right to the Marinduque congressional seat by virtue of final and executory COMELEC and Supreme Court rulings?
- May Speaker Belmonte be compelled by mandamus to administer the oath to Velasco and allow him to assume office?
- May Secretary General Barua-Yap be compelled by mandamus to remove Reyes’s name and register Velasco’s name in the Roll of Members?
- May a temporary restraining order and a writ of permanent injunction issue to enjoin Reyes from exercising the office and to order her removal?
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)