Title
Valmores vs. Achacoso
Case
G.R. No. 217453
Decision Date
Jul 19, 2017
A Seventh-day Adventist student sought exemption from Saturday classes due to Sabbath observance; MSU denied despite CHED directive. SC ruled mandamus proper, upholding religious freedom over academic policies.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 217453)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background and Parties
    • Petitioner Denmark S. Valmores is a first-year student of Mindanao State University (MSU)–College of Medicine and a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, strictly observing the Saturday Sabbath from sunset Friday to sunset Saturday.
    • Respondents Dr. Cristina Achacoso and Dr. Giovanni Cabildo are, respectively, Dean and faculty member of the MSU–College of Medicine.
    • CHED Memorandum dated November 15, 2010 mandates that higher education institutions (HEIs) excuse students whose academic schedules conflict with their religious obligations and allow them remedial work without grade penalty.
  • Chronology of Requests and Administrative Actions
    • June–August 2014: Several classes and examinations for Academic Year 2014–2015 were rescheduled to Saturdays.
    • September 13, 2014: Valmores missed his Histo-Pathology laboratory exam on Saturday, earned a failing grade, and was denied a make-up exam.
    • September 2014: Valmores submitted letters to Respondent Achacoso and a church Certification (September 15, 2014) confirming his Sabbath observance; no accommodation was granted.
  • Exhaustion of Internal and Regulatory Remedies
    • January 6, 2015: CHED Regional Office indorsed the matter to MSU President and Dean Achacoso, recommending enforcement of the 2010 CHED Memorandum.
    • MSU President instructed Dean Achacoso to comply; Respondent Achacoso still did not act.
    • March 25, 2015: Valmores’s counsel wrote Achacoso, warning of legal action; no formal response ensued.

Issues:

  • Procedural Issue
    • Whether the Supreme Court may assume jurisdiction over a Rule 65 petition for mandamus directed at HEI officers despite the rule requiring filing in the Regional Trial Court.
    • Whether other plain, speedy, and adequate remedies were exhausted before resorting to mandamus.
  • Substantive Issue
    • Whether respondents had a ministerial duty under the 2010 CHED Memorandum to excuse Valmores from Saturday classes and examinations upon submission of a proper church certification.
    • Whether respondents’ refusal violated Valmores’s constitutional right to free exercise of religion.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.