Title
Valles vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 137000
Decision Date
Aug 9, 2000
Rosalind Ybasco Lopez, a dual citizen, faced disqualification petitions over her Filipino citizenship. The Supreme Court ruled her qualified, affirming her citizenship by jus sanguinis and rejecting claims of renunciation through foreign documents.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 137000)

Facts:

  • Personal Background of Respondent
    • Rosalind Ybasco Lopez was born on May 16, 1934 in Broome, Western Australia to Telesforo Ybasco (Filipino) and Theresa Marquez (Australian).
    • In 1949, she settled in the Philippines; married a Filipino in 1952; continuously participated in elections as voter and candidate.
  • Electoral History and Disqualification Petitions
    • EPC No. 92-54 (1992): Opponent challenged her citizenship; COMELEC en banc dismissed for lack of proof of renunciation of Philippine citizenship.
    • SPA No. 95-066 (1995): Similar petition by Francisco Rabat; First Division dismissed, reiterating EPC 92-54.
    • SPA No. 98-336 (1998): Cirilo Valles filed petition for disqualification in May 1998 elections; First Division (July 17, 1998) and en banc (Jan. 15, 1999) dismissed, finding no new evidence.
  • Petitioner’s Allegations
    • 1988 Registrations: Respondent obtained Alien Certificate of Registration No. 404695 (Sept. 19, 1988), Immigrant Certificate of Residence, and Australian Passport No. H700888 (Mar. 3, 1988).
    • Alleged Loss of Philippine Citizenship: Petitioner contends that these acts constituted express renunciation.
    • Renunciation of Australian Citizenship: Respondent renounced Australian citizenship Jan. 15, 1992; passport cancelled Feb. 11, 1992; petitioner argues repatriation under RA 8171 was required.
    • Res Judicata Claim: Petitioner asserts prior COMELEC decisions are not binding and citizenship must be re-examined each time.

Issues:

  • Citizenship Status
    • Whether respondent effectively lost her Philippine citizenship by registering as an Australian national and holding an Australian passport.
  • Application of Res Judicata
    • Whether COMELEC properly relied on its prior resolutions (EPC 92-54, SPA 95-066) in dismissing the 1998 petition.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.