Title
United States of America vs. Reyes
Case
G.R. No. 79253
Decision Date
Mar 1, 1993
A U.S. Navy Exchange manager, sued personally for alleged discriminatory search of a Filipino employee, was denied state immunity by the Supreme Court, upholding Philippine jurisdiction and liability.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 79253)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Background
    • Nelia T. Montoya (private respondent) – American citizen employed as I.D. checker at the U.S. Navy Exchange (NEX) of the Joint U.S. Military Assistance Group (JUSMAG) in Quezon City; married to a Filipino-American U.S. serviceman.
    • Maxine Bradford (co-petitioner) – American citizen, activity exchange manager at NEX-JUSMAG; United States of America (public petitioner) invoked state immunity.
  • Operative Incident
    • On 22 January 1987, Bradford ordered all JUSMAG employees’ purchases to be searched; Montoya alone was searched outside the store at the parking area, in presence of onlookers.
    • Montoya felt discriminated, alleging racial bias and excess of authority; she formally protested and, finding no policy basis for the search, filed a complaint for damages.
  • Trial Court Proceedings
    • Montoya filed Civil Case No. 224-87 in RTC, Cavite, on 7 May 1987 seeking moral (₱500,000) and exemplary (₱100,000) damages plus attorney’s fees.
    • Summons served on Bradford on 13 May 1987; she obtained two extensions to answer but instead, with the U.S. government, moved to dismiss on grounds of sovereign and official immunity.
    • Montoya counter-moved for preliminary attachment; on 17 July 1987 the RTC denied the motion to dismiss and granted attachment upon bond. Writ issued 28 July 1987.
    • Neither Bradford nor the public petitioner moved for reconsideration; instead they filed a Rule 65 petition in the Supreme Court on 6 August 1987.
  • Ex-Parte Trial and Decision
    • Bradford declared in default for failure to answer; Montoya presented ex-parte evidence.
    • RTC rendered judgment on 10 September 1987 awarding Montoya ₱300,000 moral damages, ₱100,000 exemplary damages, and ₱50,000 attorney’s fees; no costs.
    • Bradford and the U.S. government sought a temporary restraining order (TRO) from the Supreme Court; TRO issued 7 December 1987 enjoining execution.

Issues:

  • Immunity Questions
    • Whether the complaint effectively sued the United States as a foreign sovereign without consent, violating state immunity.
    • Whether Bradford, as NEX-JUSMAG manager, is immune from suit for acts performed in official capacity under the 1947 Military Assistance and Bases Agreements.
  • Jurisdictional and Scope Concerns
    • Whether the search occurred outside the territorial scope of U.S. base control, thus falling within Philippine jurisdiction.
    • Whether Bradford’s acts were ultra vires—beyond her official authority—and therefore personal, not covered by immunity.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.