Title
People vs Salaveria
Case
G.R. No. 13678
Decision Date
Nov 12, 1918
A 1917 case upheld Orion, Bataan's ordinance prohibiting panguingue on non-holidays, affirming municipal police power to regulate gambling for public welfare, despite unclear classification of the game.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 13678)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Legislative Action of the Municipality
    • On February 28, 1917, the municipal council of Orion, Bataan, enacted Ordinance No. 3, prohibiting the playing of the games “Panguingue, Manilla, Jung-kiang, Paris-paris, Poker, Tute, Burro, and Treinta-y-uno” on days other than Sundays and official holidays.
    • Penalties under the ordinance were fines of ₱10–₱200 for the houseowner (casero) and ₱5–₱200 for each gambler (jugador), or subsidiary imprisonment at ₱1 per day in case of insolvency.
  • Offense and Procedural History
    • Prudencio Salaveria, then Justice of the Peace of Orion, was found on the evening of March 8, 1917, playing panguingue at his own house with six guests—an activity not on a Sunday or legal holiday. The police seized playing cards, counters, a tray, and ₱2.07.
    • Salaveria was convicted in the Justice of the Peace court and again in the Court of First Instance of Bataan. He appealed to the Supreme Court, asserting five assignments of error, primarily challenging the validity of the municipal ordinance.

Issues:

  • Scope of Express Municipal Authority over Gambling
    • Whether the ordinance is authorized under the Administrative Code’s mandate to “prohibit and penalize … gambling” (Sec. 2188[j]) and Act No. 1757’s definition of gambling as games of chance for money.
    • Whether panguingue, not definitively a game of chance under existing law, falls within the municipal power to prohibit gambling.
  • Validity under the General Welfare (Police-Power) Clause
    • Whether, aside from express gambling powers, the municipal council could enact the ordinance under the general welfare clause (Administrative Code Sec. 2184) empowering regulations “necessary and proper … to improve the morals, peace, good order … of the municipality.”
    • Whether the ordinance is reasonable, non-repugnant to national law, and consistent with due-process guarantees.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.