Case Digest (G.R. No. 7123)
Facts:
United States v. Rosalino Rodriguez, G.R. No. 7123, August 17, 1912, the Supreme Court En Banc, Arellano, C.J., writing for the Court.
The accused, Rosalino Rodriguez (defendant-appellant), was criminally charged with having struck Marciano Magno two blows with the fist — one on the left side toward the stomach and another on the back — after which Magno fell, rose with help from two bystanders, attempted to walk home, went about twenty brazas, and then collapsed and died. At trial two eyewitnesses testified to having seen the defendant strike the two blows; a third witness testified to having received from the defendant, upon arrest, a statement to the effect that the death was an unforeseen misfortune.
The defendant offered three defenses: (1) that his daughter Roberta struck the fatal blow because Magno had allegedly grabbed her hand with unchaste intent, supported by the daughter's testimony and two other witnesses; (2) that the defendant's right hand was disabled and therefore could not have inflicted the blows; and (3) a medical certificate arising from an autopsy showing hypertrophy of the heart, an enlarged spleen with discharge and abdominal peritonitis, from which the physician stated he could not determine whether death was due to the traumatisms or the preexisting condition, only that the traumatisms may have hastened death.
The Court of First Instance of Nueva Ecija rejected the defenses, credited the prosecution evidence, convicted Rodriguez of homicide, and sentenced him to twelve years and one day of reclusion temporal, accessory penalties, an indemnity of P1,000 to the heirs, and costs. Rodriguez appealed the conviction to the Supreme Court.
On appeal (the mode of review being an ordinary appeal transmitted from the Court of First Instance), the Supreme Court examined the eyewitness testimony, the defendant's own statements, the testimony offered in defense, and the medical certificate. The Court found it established that the defendant struck Magno and that the blows could have produced internal injuries (inflammation of the spleen and peritonitis) that hastened death; however, it also found that the assault was prov...(Subscriber-Only)
Issues:
- Was the evidence sufficient to hold Rosalino Rodriguez criminally responsible for the death of Marciano Magno, notwithstanding the victim's preexisting internal disease and the inconclusive autopsy report?
- Did circumstances exist to justify reducing the penalty under the extenuating circumstances provision (rule 5, ...(Subscriber-Only)
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)