Title
People vs. Mojica
Case
G.R. No. 17650
Decision Date
Feb 15, 1922
A police officer is acquitted of the crime of homicide after fatally shooting a Constabulary soldier in self-defense during a confrontation in Manila, as the court determines that his use of force was justified and necessary to protect himself from the soldier's unlawful aggression.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 17650)

Facts:

  • The case is People vs. Mojica, G.R. No. 17650, decided on February 15, 1922.
  • Defendant Artemio Mojica served as a police officer in Manila.
  • He was charged with homicide for the shooting of Crispin Macasinag, a Constabulary soldier.
  • The incident took place on December 14, 1920, during heightened tensions between the police and the Constabulary.
  • On December 13, Mojica and a colleague faced threats from three armed Constabulary soldiers.
  • The following day, Mojica sought refuge in a restaurant.
  • On December 14, he encountered aggressive Constabulary soldiers, including Macasinag.
  • Macasinag violently resisted arrest and attacked Mojica with a knife.
  • In response to the immediate threat, Mojica shot Macasinag, who later succumbed to his injuries.
  • The lower court convicted Mojica of homicide, sentencing him to fourteen years, eight months, and one day of reclusion temporal, along with accessory penalties and an order to indemnify Macasinag's heirs.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court reversed the lower court's decision.
  • Mojica was acquitted of the homicide charge.
  • The court determined that Mojica acted in legitimate self-defense against Macasinag's unlawful aggression. ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The ruling was grounded in self-defense principles outlined in the Penal Code, which require unlawful aggression, reasonable necessity of means, and absence of provocation.
  • Macasinag's knife attack was identified as unlawful aggression, with no provocation from Mojica.
  • Police officers are expected to confront aggression rather than r...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.