Title
Turner vs. Lorenzo Shipping Corp.
Case
G.R. No. 157479
Decision Date
Nov 24, 2010
Shareholders sought payment for shares after corporate amendment removed pre-emptive rights; claim dismissed as premature due to lack of unrestricted retained earnings at filing.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 157479)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Petitioners’ shareholding and demand
    • The Turners held 1,010,000 shares of Lorenzo Shipping Corporation and voted against a June 1999 amendment removing pre-emptive rights, demanding payment at P2.276/share (total P2,298,760).
    • The corporation proposed P0.41/share based on market value and conditioned payment upon available unrestricted retained earnings.
  • Appraisal committee and valuation
    • Pursuant to Section 82, each party nominated an appraiser and jointly selected a chairman; on October 27, 2000 the committee fixed fair value at P2.54/share (P2,565,400 total).
    • The Turners demanded payment of that amount plus 2%/month penalty and reimbursement of appraisal fees.
  • Refusal and initial suit
    • By letter dated January 2, 2001, the corporation refused payment, citing a deficit of P72,973,114 unrestricted retained earnings as of December 31, 1999.
    • The Turners filed a collection suit (Civil Case No. 01-086) in the Makati RTC on January 22, 2001.
  • Proceedings in the courts below
    • On June 26, 2002, the Turners moved for partial summary judgment, asserting P11,975,490 unrestricted retained earnings as of March 31, 2002 and finality of the appraisal award.
    • RTC Branch 46 (Manila) granted the motion and a writ of execution in November 2002; partial enforcement followed.
    • Lorenzo Shipping filed certiorari in the CA, obtained a TRO, and on March 4, 2003 the CA dismissed the suit for lack of cause of action at the time of filing.

Issues:

  • Whether the RTC acted beyond its jurisdiction in granting partial summary judgment and issuing a writ of execution when no unrestricted retained earnings existed at suit commencement.
  • Whether the Turners had a valid cause of action on January 22, 2001, given the absence of unrestricted retained earnings as a condition precedent.
  • Whether the CA properly dismissed Civil Case No. 01-086, notwithstanding the petition’s primary aim to annul only specific RTC orders.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.