Title
Tuason vs. Bank of Commerce
Case
G.R. No. 192076
Decision Date
Nov 21, 2012
In the Philippine jurisprudence case of Tuason v. Bank of Commerce, Michelle Tuason is constructively dismissed by the bank after being pressured to resign and replaced without being offered a new assignment, leading to a legal battle that ultimately rules in favor of Tuason.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 192076)

Facts:

  • Michelle T. Tuason started working at the Bank of Commerce (BOC) as the head of the Marketing Department in the Property Management Group (PMG) on January 1, 2002.
  • She was appointed as officer-in-charge of PMG on May 2, 2002, and officially became the head on January 2, 2003.
  • Tuason was responsible for managing the bank's real estate and acquired properties.
  • In February 2005, she faced administrative charges related to irregularities in property sales, resulting in a 30-day suspension in September 2005.
  • Despite receiving a performance rating of 63% in 2006, she was pressured to resign by her sector head, Mario Padilla, on July 5, 2007, which she refused.
  • After declining to resign, she requested a leave of absence due to stress, which was denied.
  • While on leave, she received conflicting notifications, including one indicating that a new head of PMG would assume her position on July 16, 2007.
  • Feeling coerced, Tuason filed a case for constructive dismissal.
  • The Labor Arbiter dismissed her complaint, but the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) ruled in her favor, recognizing constructive dismissal.
  • The Court of Appeals reversed the NLRC's decision, prompting Tuason to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Michelle T. Tuason, overturning the Court of Appeals' decision and reinstating the NLRC's ruling of constructive dismissal.
  • The Court determined that BOC's actions, including the pres...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • Constructive dismissal occurs when an employee is compelled to resign due to coercive actions by the employer.
  • The Court observed that Tuason experienced undue pressure to resign without justifiable reasons, and BOC failed to provide a legitimate reassignment after her refusal.
  • The managem...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.