Title
Supreme Court
Tsai vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 120098
Decision Date
Oct 2, 2001
EVERTEX secured loans from PBCom, mortgaging assets. Disputed properties, not included in mortgages, were improperly foreclosed and sold to Tsai. SC ruled sale void, upheld damages, and ordered return of properties.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 120098)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Mortgage and Loans
    • On November 26, 1975, Ever Textile Mills, Inc. (EVERTEX) obtained a P3,000,000 loan from PBCom, secured by a Real and Chattel Mortgage covering TCT No. 372097 (land and improvements) and a detailed schedule of machineries and equipment.
    • On April 23, 1979, PBCom extended a second loan of P3,356,000 to EVERTEX, secured by a Chattel Mortgage listing similar machines and equipment.
  • Foreclosure and Title Consolidation
    • EVERTEX filed insolvency proceedings on November 19, 1982; the court declared insolvency on November 24, 1982, and took custody of its assets.
    • PBCom initiated extrajudicial foreclosure under Acts 3135 and 1506; public auctions on December 15 and 23, 1982, resulted in PBCom as highest bidder and issuance of Certificates of Sale; PBCom consolidated title on March 7, 1984.
  • Lease, Sale and Initial Litigation
    • In November 1986, PBCom leased the factory (including machinery) to Ruby L. Tsai for P50,000/month; on May 3, 1988, PBCom sold the entire factory “lock, stock and barrel” to Tsai for P9,000,000, including the contested machines.
    • On March 16, 1989, EVERTEX sued PBCom and Tsai to annul the sale of certain machines (14 Interlock Circular Knitting Machines, a jet dryer, a dryer, a raisin and a heatset equipment) allegedly excluded from the mortgages and sheriff’s sale, and to recover damages.
    • The RTC annulled the sale insofar as it affected those machines, ordered their return, and awarded actual, exemplary damages, attorney’s fees and costs; the Court of Appeals affirmed with deletion of exemplary damages and reduction of actual damages.

Issues:

  • Coverage of the Disputed Machines
    • Whether the machines acquired in 1981 were included in the 1975 Real and Chattel Mortgage or the 1979 Chattel Mortgage.
    • Whether extrajudicial foreclosure validly extended to those machines under Act 3135 and Act 1506.
  • Validity of the Sale to Tsai
    • Whether Tsai is a purchaser in good faith and for value with a better right than EVERTEX.
    • Whether the defenses of prescription, laches, and Torrens title indefeasibility bar EVERTEX’s claims.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.