Case Digest (G.R. No. L-43495-99)
Facts:
Tropical Hut Employees Union-CGW, et al., G.R. Nos. L-43495-99, January 20, 1990, Supreme Court First Division, Medialdea, J., writing for the Court. Petitioners are rank-and-file employees and the local union they organized (styled THEU), who contested suspensions and dismissals imposed after the local disaffiliated from its national federation and affiliated with another. Respondents include Tropical Hut Food Market, Inc., certain company officers, the rival local group led by Arturo Dilag, and the National Association of Trade Unions (NATU), as well as the NLRC and the Secretary of Labor insofar as they reviewed labor-arbitration awards.The THEU was organized on January 2, 1968, and on January 3, 1968 applied for and received affiliation with NATU; Registration Certificate No. 5544‑IP was issued in the name of “Tropical Hut Employees Union - NATU.” The company and THEU executed a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) effective April 1, 1968 (renewed May 21, 1971) containing a union‑shop/security clause and an attached check‑off authorization naming NATU as collective bargaining agent for remittance purposes. NATU, however, appears not to have been registered with the Department of Labor.
In late 1973 and early 1974, THEU officers notified NATU and the company of THEU’s disaffiliation from NATU and of its affiliation with the Confederation of General Workers (CGW). THEU‑CGW officers (with Jose Encinas as president) sought remittance of dues, prompting NATU to contest the disaffiliation, claim procedural defects (notice requirements), and request the company to dismiss Encinas and other officers for violating the CBA’s security clause. The company suspended Encinas on January 11, 1974, and suspended additional members on January 15, March 5, March 8 and March 11, 1974, pending applications for clearance to dismiss them.
The suspended employees filed multiple unfair labor practice complaints. Labor Arbitrators issued orders: Arbitrator Daniel Lucas (March 21, 1974) treated certain issues as moot in light of an NLRC certification‑election order and ordered reinstatement and other relief; Arbitrator Cleto Villatuya (October 14, 1974) ordered immediate reinstatement of 63 complainants with back wages and directed denial of company clearance to dismiss. All parties appealed to the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC).
On August 1, 1975 the NLRC reversed the arbitrators, held the complainants had lost employee status, but compassionately ordered that the company reemploy them upon voluntary reaffirmation of loyalty to THEU‑NATU and NATU when hiring additional personnel. The employees appealed to the Secretary of Labor, who on February 23, 1976 affirmed the NLRC decision except that...(Pro-only)
Issues:
- Was the petition procedurally premature for failure to appeal the Secretary of Labor’s decision to the Office of the President?
- Was the disaffiliation of the local union (THEU) from NATU valid?
- Were the suspensions and dismissals of petitioner employees illegal and an u...(Pro-only)
Ruling:
- (Pro-only)
Ratio:
- (Pro-only)
Doctrine:
- (Pro-only)