Title
Tong vs. Go Tiat Kun
Case
G.R. No. 196023
Decision Date
Apr 21, 2014
A family dispute over Lot 998 arose when Juan Tong, a Chinese citizen, registered it under his Filipino son Luis, Sr., creating an implied trust. After Luis, Sr.'s death, his heirs claimed ownership, but the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Juan Tong’s other children, upholding the trust and ordering reconveyance.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 196023)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Property
    • Petitioners: Nine children (and their descendants) of Spouses Juan Tong and Sy Un, claiming Lot 998-A (2,525 sqm) now under TCT No. 134082.
    • Respondents: Heirs of the late Luis Juan Tong, Sr. (the tenth child), including his spouse Go Tiat Kun and their children.
  • Acquisition and Initial Registration
    • 1957: Juan Tong (a Chinese citizen) finances the P 55,000 purchase of Lot 998 but registers title under his only Filipino son, Luis Sr., to circumvent citizenship restrictions.
    • The lot serves as stockyard for “Juan Tong Lumber” (later corporation in 1978) and remains undivided and in family use.
  • Succession, Subdivision, and Prior Litigation
    • 1981: Luis Sr. dies. Respondents extrajudicially settle his estate (approved 1982), securing TCT No. T-60231.
    • 1992 subdivision: Lot 998-A to Go Tiat Kun and her children (TCT No. 97068), Lot 998-B to Luis Jr. (TCT No. T-96216).
    • Lot 998-B sold to FRDC then VGCC; petitioners successfully annulled the sale in Civil Case No. 22730, reconveyed Lot 998-B.
    • 2001: Go Tiat Kun sells undivided interest in Lot 998-A to her children, producing TCT No. 134082.
    • 2005: Petitioners file Civil Case No. 05-28626 for Nullification of Titles, Deeds of Extra-Judicial Settlement and Sale, and Damages over Lot 998-A.
  • Trial and Appellate Proceedings
    • RTC (2009): Finds implied resulting trust in favor of petitioners; nullifies respondents’ deeds and titles; orders reconveyance and damages.
    • CA (2010): Reverses RTC, dismisses complaint—rules express trust requires writing, implied trust terminated by death and prescribed, presumption of donation, laches and estoppel.
    • SC Grant of Review: Petitioners elevate the case by petition for review under Rule 45.

Issues:

  • Whether an implied resulting trust arose when Lot 998 was registered in Luis Sr.’s name despite being purchased with Juan Tong’s funds.
  • Whether parol evidence is admissible to prove the existence of the trust.
  • Whether the petitioners’ action is barred by prescription, estoppel, or laches.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.