Title
The Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf Philippines, Inc. vs. Arenas
Case
G.R. No. 208908
Decision Date
Mar 11, 2015
Arenas, a CBTL barista, was dismissed for minor infractions (eating on duty, tardiness, policy violations). Courts ruled dismissal disproportionate, affirming no serious misconduct or neglect, and absolved corporate officers of liability.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 208908)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

Employment and Duties
On April 1, 2008, Rolly P. Arenas (Arenas) was hired by The Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf Philippines, Inc. (CBTL) as a barista at its Paseo Center Branch. His primary responsibilities included taking customer orders and preparing food and beverages. Upon signing his employment contract, Arenas was informed of CBTL's employment policies.

Mystery Guest Shopper Report
CBTL regularly employed a "mystery guest shopper" to covertly inspect the performance of its baristas. In April 2009, a mystery guest shopper reported that on March 30, 2009, Arenas was seen eating non-CBTL products at the store's al fresco dining area while on duty, leaving the counter unattended.

Duty Manager's Inspection
On April 28, 2009, Katrina Basallo, the duty manager, conducted a routine inspection and found an iced tea bottle being chilled in the ice bin, which violated CBTL's sanitation policy. When questioned, Arenas muttered, "Kaninong iced tea?" and immediately disposed of the bottle outside the store.

List of Infractions
Basallo prepared a report listing Arenas's infractions:

  • Leaving the counter unattended and eating chips in an unauthorized area while on duty (March 30, 2009).
  • Reporting late for work on several occasions (April 1, 3, and 22).
  • Placing an iced tea bottle in the ice bin despite knowing company policy (April 28, 2009).

Termination of Employment
CBTL required Arenas to explain his violations. Finding his written explanation unsatisfactory, CBTL terminated his employment. Arenas filed a complaint for illegal dismissal, which the Labor Arbiter (LA) ruled in his favor. The National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) and the Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the LA's decision.

Issues:

The main issue is whether CBTL illegally dismissed Arenas from employment. Specifically, the Court must determine if Arenas's infractions constituted serious misconduct, willful disobedience, gross and habitual neglect of duties, or breach of trust and confidence, justifying his termination.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.