Title
Testate Estate of Abada vs. Abaja
Case
G.R. No. 147145
Decision Date
Jan 31, 2005
Alipio Abada's 1932 will, contested for improper execution and undue influence, was admitted to probate as it substantially complied with legal formalities under the Civil Code of 1889 and Code of Civil Procedure, affirmed by the Supreme Court.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 147145)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Decedent and Family Background
    • Alipio Abada died in May 1940; his widow, Paula Toray, died in September 1943; both left no legitimate children.
    • Alleged natural children of Abada were Eulogio Abaja and Rosario Cordova; Eulogio’s son Alipio C. Abaja later acted as petitioner for probate.
  • Probate Proceedings
    • On 13 September 1968, Alipio C. Abaja filed SP No. 070 (313-8668) in the CFI (now RTC-Kabankalan) to probate Abada’s 4 June 1932 will; oppositors included Nicanor Caponong and collateral heirs (nephews, nieces, grandchildren).
    • On the same date, SP No. 071 (312-8669) was filed to probate Toray’s will; oppositors raised identical grounds of invalidity.
    • On 20 September 1968, Caponong filed SP No. 069 (309) for letters of administration of the intestate estates.
    • In August 1981, the RTC admitted Toray’s will; order became final when oppositors did not seek reconsideration.
    • In November 1990, Belinda Caponong-Noble was appointed Special Administratrix of Abada and Toray’s estate; her motion to dismiss the petition to probate Abada’s will was denied in August 1991.
    • In June 1994, the RTC rendered a resolution admitting Abada’s will, finding substantial compliance with formalities, and appointed administrators.
    • Caponong-Noble appealed; in January 2001, the Court of Appeals affirmed the RTC decision.

Issues:

  • What law governs the form and probate of Abada’s 1932 will?
  • Does Abada’s will require acknowledgment before a notary public?
  • Must the will expressly state it was written in a language known to the testator?
  • Does the will contain a valid attestation clause under applicable law?
  • Is Caponong-Noble precluded from challenging the language requirement on appeal?
  • May evidence aliunde be used to establish testator’s knowledge of the language?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.