Case Digest (G.R. No. 166471) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In Tawang Multi-Purpose Cooperative v. La Trinidad Water District, decided on March 22, 2011, petitioner Tawang Multi-Purpose Cooperative (TMPC), a Cooperative Development Authority-registered association organized to supply domestic water in Barangay Tawang, La Trinidad, Benguet, filed on October 9, 2000 with the National Water Resources Board (NWRB) an application for a Certificate of Public Convenience (CPC). Respondent La Trinidad Water District (LTWD), a government-created local water utility under PD No. 198, opposed the application, invoking Section 47 of PD No. 198 as granting it an exclusive franchise. On July 23 and August 15, 2002, the NWRB approved and affirmed TMPC’s application, finding exclusive franchises unconstitutional under the 1987 Constitution. LTWD’s motion for reconsideration was denied on November 18, 2002. LTWD then appealed to the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Bran... Case Digest (G.R. No. 166471) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Application and Opposition
- On 9 October 2000, Tawang Multi-Purpose Cooperative (TMPC) filed with the National Water Resources Board (NWRB) an application for a Certificate of Public Convenience (CPC) to operate a waterworks system in Barangay Tawang, La Trinidad, Benguet.
- La Trinidad Water District (LTWD), a local water utility created under PD No. 198, opposed, invoking Section 47 of its charter which it claimed grants it an “exclusive franchise” over domestic, industrial, and commercial water service in its district.
- Proceedings Before the NWRB
- On 23 July 2002, NWRB Resolution No. 04-0702 approved TMPC’s CPC application.
- In its 15 August 2002 Decision, the NWRB ruled exclusive franchises unconstitutional, found TMPC qualified, and granted the CPC.
- LTWD’s motion for reconsideration was denied by NWRB on 18 November 2002.
- RTC Proceedings and Petition
- On 1 October 2004, RTC Branch 62, La Trinidad, set aside the NWRB’s Resolution and Decision, cancelled TMPC’s CPC, and upheld the validity of Section 47.
- On 6 November 2004, the RTC denied TMPC’s motion for reconsideration.
- TMPC filed this petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 (G.R. No. 166471), challenging the RTC’s rulings.
Issues:
- Whether the RTC erred in upholding the validity of Section 47 of PD No. 198 as an exclusive franchise provision, contrary to the constitutional prohibition on exclusive public utility franchises.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)