Title
Talabis vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 214647
Decision Date
Mar 4, 2020
The Supreme Court affirms with modifications the Regional Trial Court's penalty against Edwin Talabis for illegally cutting and possessing timber, addressing jurisdiction and mitigating circumstances.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 214647)

Facts:

  • The case involves Edwin Talabis (petitioner) and the People of the Philippines (respondent).
  • Events occurred on December 4, 2005, in Sinto Bangao, Buguias, Benguet.
  • Petitioner and co-accused Arsebino Talabis were charged with violating Section 68 of Presidential Decree No. 705 (Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines).
  • The complaint was filed by Leonora Edoc and Rhoda E. Bay-An before Provincial Prosecutor Felix T. Cabading.
  • The Information alleged conspiracy to cut, collect, and gather pine trees without a lawful permit, totaling 3.1464 cubic meters valued at P22,496.76.
  • Witnesses Eric Lanta-an and Raymundo Abuyog heard a chainsaw and saw the accused cutting trees.
  • Leonora and her husband discovered the missing trees and confronted the accused, who could not provide a cutting permit.
  • Forester Cesar Kitayan verified the illegal cutting, leading to the complaint.
  • The Regional Trial Court (RTC) found both accused guilty and sentenced them to imprisonment.
  • The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the RTC's ruling with modifications on the penalty.
  • The petitioner sought further review from the Supreme Court after the CA denied his motion for reconsideration.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled that the RTC did acquire jurisdiction over the case, affirming the CA's decision.
  • The Court held that the petitioner was not entitled t...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court explained that the RTC's jurisdiction was valid even with a complaint from private individuals, as Section 80 of PD 705 permits such actions when the offense is not witnessed by a forest officer.
  • The Court referenced Merida v. People, establishing that private individuals can initiate complaints for violations of PD 705.
  • Procedural rules do not prevent private individuals from filing complaints with the Pro...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.