G.R. No. 20902 - Tad-y vs. Tad-y

Ask AI

G.R. No. 20902: Tad-y vs. Tad-y

Getting related questions...
What do you want to know about the case?
Your conversations and searches stay on your device. We do not store or track your activity on our servers. To know more about our privacy commitment see jur.ph/privacy Ask AI provides quick answers grounded in full case texts to avoid mistakes. Always verify with the original text.

Ask AI

Title Supreme Court: Tad-y vs. Tad-y

Case: G.R. No. 20902

Decision Date: Oct 9, 1923

A dispute over the intestate estate of Vicente Tad-Y arose after his will was withdrawn from probate. The court appointed Manuel Locsin as administrator, upheld by the Supreme Court, ruling the appointment valid and non-appealable, with no consent required from heirs.

special administrator

estate

appointment

Case Digest (G.R. No. 20902)
Detailed Concise

Full Text Too Short for AI Analysis

Unlock Full Case Digest

END

Case Digest (G.R. No. 20902) Detailed Concise

Case Digest (G.R. No. 20902) Detailed Concise

Case Digest (G.R. No. 20902)
Detailed Concise

Case Digest (G.R. No. 20902)
Detailed Concise