Case Digest (A.M. No. RTJ-16-2460)
Facts:
- Complaint filed by Atty. Jerome Norman L. Tacorda and Leticia Rodrigo-Dumdum against Presiding Judge Perla V. Cabrera-Faller and Ophelia G. Suluen of Branch 90, Regional Trial Court (RTC), Dasmariñas City, Cavite.
- Allegations of gross ignorance of the law, gross inefficiency, delay in the administration of justice, and impropriety.
- Stemmed from Civil Case No. 398810, initially pending before Judge Fernando L. Felicen of Branch 20, RTC, Imus, Cavite.
- Judge Felicen inhibited himself from the case and it was raffled to the sala of Judge Cabrera-Faller.
- Delays in the proceedings, including setting of pre-trial dates, referral for mediation, and filing of a motion to expunge the plaintiffs' pre-trial brief.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- No substantiation of charges of gross ignorance of the law and impropriety against Judge Cabrera-Faller and Suluen.
- Merit in the complaint for gross inefficiency and delay in the administration of justice against Judge Cabrera-Faller.
- Delay in the disposition of cases amounts to a denial of justice and erodes public faith and confidence in the Judiciary.
- Fine of Twenty Thousand Pesos (P20,000.00) imposed on Judge Cab...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) found no evidence of gross ignorance of the law or impropriety on the part of Judge Cabrera-Faller and Suluen.
- However, the OCA found Judge Cabrera-Faller guilty of gross inefficiency and delay in the administration of justice for failing to promptly act on the motion filed by the Spouses Dumdum.
- The Court agreed with the findings of the OCA and emphasized that delay in the disposition of cases amounts to a denial of justice and erodes public faith an...continue reading
Case Digest (A.M. No. RTJ-16-2460)
Facts:
The case involves a complaint filed by Atty. Jerome Norman L. Tacorda and Leticia Rodrigo-Dumdum against Presiding Judge Perla V. Cabrera-Faller and Ophelia G. Suluen, both of Branch 90, Regional Trial Court (RTC), Dasmariñas City, Cavite. The complaint arose from Civil Case No. 398810, which was initially pending before Judge Fernando L. Felicen of Branch 20, RTC, Imus, Cavite. However, the case was later transferred to the sala of Judge Cabrera-Faller. The complainants alleged that Judge Cabrera-Faller failed to promptly act on a motion filed by the Spouses Dumdum, resulting in a delay in the proceedings. In response, Judge Cabrera-Faller and Suluen argued that there was no ignorance of the law, no gross inefficiency, and no delay in the administration of justice. They also claimed that the complaint was baseless and illusory.
Issue:
The main issue raised in the case is whether Judge Cabrera-Faller and Suluen should be held li...