Title
Swire Realty Development Corp. vs. Yu
Case
G.R. No. 207133
Decision Date
Mar 9, 2015
Buyer paid in full for a condominium unit, but developer failed to deliver on time. Court upheld rescission due to substantial breach, ordering refund with interest, damages, and attorney’s fees. Appeal to OP deemed untimely.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-29802)

Facts:

  • Contract to Sell and Payments
    • On July 25, 1995, Swire Realty Development Corporation (petitioner) and Jayne Yu (respondent) executed a Contract to Sell for Unit 3007 of Palace of Makati (137.30 sqm) at a total price of ₱7,519,371.80, payable in equal monthly installments until September 24, 1997.
    • Respondent also bought a parking slot for ₱600,000.00; on September 24, 1997, she paid the full contract price for the unit and made a ₱20,000.00 down payment for the slot.
  • Failure to Deliver and HLURB Proceedings
    • Petitioner failed to finish and deliver the unit by the agreed completion date. On October 19, 2004, the HLURB ENCRFO dismissed respondent’s complaint for rescission, ruling that only substantial breaches justify rescission and instead ordering repairs or compensatory damages (₱100,000), moral damages (₱20,000), and attorney’s fees (₱20,000).
    • On March 30, 2006, the HLURB Board of Commissioners reversed the ENCRFO, declared the contract rescinded, ordered refund of ₱7,519,371.80 with 6% interest from extrajudicial demand, awarded attorney’s fees (₱20,000) and an administrative fine (₱10,000); motion for reconsideration was denied on June 14, 2007.
  • Appeals to the Office of the President and the Court of Appeals
    • Petitioner appealed to the Office of the President (OP) on August 7, 2007; on November 21, 2007, the OP dismissed the appeal as filed out of time. A motion for reconsideration was granted on February 17, 2009, reinstating the ENCRFO decision; respondent’s motion was denied August 18, 2011.
    • Respondent then appealed to the Court of Appeals (CA). On January 24, 2013, the CA reversed the OP and reinstated the HLURB Board decision; petitioner’s motion for reconsideration was denied April 30, 2013.

Issues:

  • Whether petitioner’s appeal to the Office of the President was timely filed.
  • Whether the delay in completion and delivery of the condominium unit constitutes a substantial breach warranting rescission of the Contract to Sell.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.