Title
Supreme Court
St. Luke's Medical Center Employees Association - AFW vs. National Labor Relations Commission
Case
G.R. No. 162053
Decision Date
Mar 7, 2007
A radiologic technologist was legally dismissed for failing to obtain mandatory certification under RA 7431 despite repeated warnings and opportunities to comply.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 162053)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Employment and Qualifications
    • Maribel S. Santos was hired by St. Luke’s Medical Center, Inc. (SLMC) on October 13, 1984 as an X-Ray Technician in its Radiology Department.
    • She graduated with an Associate in Radiologic Technology from The Family Clinic Inc. School of Radiologic Technology.
  • Statutory Requirement under Republic Act No. 7431
    • RA 7431 (“Radiologic Technology Act of 1992”), enacted April 22, 1992, mandates that no person may practice as a radiologic or X-ray technologist without a certificate of registration from the Board of Radiologic Technology.
    • Exemptions exist only under Sections 16 and 17; all others must pass the licensure examination.
  • Notices and Separation Proceedings by SLMC
    • September 12, 1995 – SLMC issued a final notice requiring all radiologic practitioners to comply with RA 7431 by December 31, 1995 or face transfer to non-licensed positions if available.
    • March 4 & May 14, 1997 – Additional final notices directed Santos to take and pass the June 1997 board exam or face possible retirement or transfer.
    • March 13, 1998 – Last warning issued for Santos to take the June 1998 board exam or face separation.
    • November 23 & 26, 1998 – SLMC approved her early retirement in lieu of separation pay but issued Notice of Separation effective December 30, 1998 after she declined the offer.
    • January 6, 1999 – A second Notice of Separation effective February 5, 1999 was issued after Santos failed to appeal her failed exam results to the PRC.
  • Union Interventions and Correspondence
    • December 18, 1998 – Philippine Association of Radiologic Technologists requested SLMC to assign Santos to any department pending her licensure.
    • September 22 & 24, 1999 – Alliance of Filipino Workers (AFW) sought her placement as a CSS Aide; SLMC responded that Santos was free to apply but must meet standard recruitment requirements.
    • December 27, 1999 – SLMC offered Santos the position of Secretary in the Dietary Department, setting a deadline for her acceptance.
  • Procedural History
    • March 2, 1999 – Santos filed a complaint for illegal dismissal and non-payment of benefits before the NLRC, seeking moral and exemplary damages and attorney’s fees.
    • September 5, 2000 – Labor Arbiter ordered SLMC to pay Santos ₱115,500 as separation pay; dismissed all other claims.
    • August 23 & December 27, 2002 – NLRC affirmed the Arbiter’s decision and denied reconsideration.
    • January 29, 2004 – Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 75732 affirmed the NLRC decision.
    • March 7, 2007 – Supreme Court promulgated Decision in G.R. No. 162053 denying the petition for certiorari.

Issues:

  • Whether the CA overlooked material facts and circumstances concerning the claim of illegal dismissal.
  • Whether the CA committed grave abuse of discretion by failing to clearly resolve petitioner’s constitutional right to security of tenure.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.