Title
Spouses Tan vs. China Banking Corp.
Case
G.R. No. 200299
Decision Date
Aug 17, 2016
Lorenze Realty defaulted on loans secured by mortgaged properties; foreclosure sale left a deficiency. SC upheld CA's ruling: 12% penalty rate applied, deficiency payable.

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-32163)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties
    • Lorenze Realty and Development Corporation (represented by heirs Joel Tan and Eric Tan), borrower and mortgagor.
    • China Banking Corporation, lender and mortgagee.
  • Loan transactions and security
    • In 1997, Lorenze Realty executed 17 promissory notes totaling ₱71,050,000.00, each stipulating:
1/10 of 1% per day penalty on the total obligation from default until full payment, and 10% of the total due as attorney’s fees.
  • To secure the loans, Lorenze Realty mortgaged 11 parcels of land (various TCT Nos.) by Real Estate Mortgages registered in Valenzuela City.
  • Default, foreclosure, and deficiency
    • Upon default, China Bank extrajudicially foreclosed the mortgages; at public auction, it purchased the properties for ₱85,000,000.00.
    • As of August 10, 1998, the Statement of Account showed total indebtedness of ₱114,258,179.81 (principal, interest, penalties, registration and litigation expenses).
    • After applying the ₱85,000,000.00 proceeds, a balance of ₱29,258,179.81 remained.
  • Collection suit and procedural history
    • China Bank sued for deficiency (₱29,258,179.81), 2% per month penalties, 5% attorney’s fees, litigation expenses and costs.
    • Defendants claimed: lack of true meeting of minds, usurious penalty, and that the sale fully extinguished the debt.
    • RTC (Dec. 29, 2003) found defendants jointly and severally liable for the deficiency, 2% per month surcharge, 5% attorney’s fees, expenses and costs.
    • CA (Oct. 14, 2011) affirmed with modification: reduced surcharge to 12% per annum and attorney’s fees to 2% of total due; denied reconsideration (Jan. 24, 2012).
    • Lorenze Realty filed a Petition for Review on Certiorari before the Supreme Court.

Issues:

  • Whether Lorenze Realty’s obligation was fully settled when the mortgaged properties were sold at public auction for ₱85,000,000.00.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.