Case Digest (G.R. No. L-32163) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In Spouses Juan Chuy Tan and Mary Tan (substituted by surviving heirs Joel Tan and Eric Tan) vs. China Banking Corporation, the petitioners, representing Lorenze Realty and Development Corporation, obtained various loans from China Bank in 1997 totaling ₱71,050,000.00 under promissory notes stipulating a penalty of one-tenth of one percent per day on the total obligation and ten percent attorney’s fees. To secure these obligations, Lorenze Realty executed real estate mortgages over eleven parcels of land in Valenzuela City. Upon default, China Bank extrajudicially foreclosed the mortgages, complied with notice and publication requirements, and purchased the properties at public auction for ₱85,000,000.00. As of August 10, 1998, the indebtedness, including principal, interest, penalties and foreclosure expenses, amounted to ₱114,258,179.81, leaving a deficiency of ₱29,258,179.81 after applying the sale proceeds. China Bank filed a collection suit for the deficiency before the RTC Case Digest (G.R. No. L-32163) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Parties
- Lorenze Realty and Development Corporation (represented by heirs Joel Tan and Eric Tan), borrower and mortgagor.
- China Banking Corporation, lender and mortgagee.
- Loan transactions and security
- In 1997, Lorenze Realty executed 17 promissory notes totaling ₱71,050,000.00, each stipulating:
- To secure the loans, Lorenze Realty mortgaged 11 parcels of land (various TCT Nos.) by Real Estate Mortgages registered in Valenzuela City.
- Default, foreclosure, and deficiency
- Upon default, China Bank extrajudicially foreclosed the mortgages; at public auction, it purchased the properties for ₱85,000,000.00.
- As of August 10, 1998, the Statement of Account showed total indebtedness of ₱114,258,179.81 (principal, interest, penalties, registration and litigation expenses).
- After applying the ₱85,000,000.00 proceeds, a balance of ₱29,258,179.81 remained.
- Collection suit and procedural history
- China Bank sued for deficiency (₱29,258,179.81), 2% per month penalties, 5% attorney’s fees, litigation expenses and costs.
- Defendants claimed: lack of true meeting of minds, usurious penalty, and that the sale fully extinguished the debt.
- RTC (Dec. 29, 2003) found defendants jointly and severally liable for the deficiency, 2% per month surcharge, 5% attorney’s fees, expenses and costs.
- CA (Oct. 14, 2011) affirmed with modification: reduced surcharge to 12% per annum and attorney’s fees to 2% of total due; denied reconsideration (Jan. 24, 2012).
- Lorenze Realty filed a Petition for Review on Certiorari before the Supreme Court.
Issues:
- Whether Lorenze Realty’s obligation was fully settled when the mortgaged properties were sold at public auction for ₱85,000,000.00.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)