Title
Spouses Litonjua vs. L and R Corp.
Case
G.R. No. 130722
Decision Date
Dec 9, 1999
Spouses sold mortgaged property without consent, violating mortgagee's right of first refusal; sale rescinded, redemption disallowed, properties retained by mortgagee.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 130722)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Loan and Mortgage Contract
    • On August 6, 1974 and March 27, 1978, spouses Reynaldo K. Litonjua and Erlinda P. Litonjua borrowed P200,000.00 each (total P400,000.00) from L & R Corporation.
    • The loans were secured by a real estate mortgage over two Cubao, Quezon City parcels (TCT Nos. 197232 – 599 m²; 197233 – 1,436 m²).
    • The mortgage deed contained:
      • Paragraph 8 – prohibition against any sale, disposition or encumbrance without prior written consent of L & R.
      • Paragraph 9 – a “right of first refusal” in favor of L & R should the mortgagors decide to sell.
    • The mortgage was duly registered with the Quezon City Register of Deeds.
  • Sale to PWHAS and Annotation
    • On July 14, 1979, the Litonjuas sold both parcels to Philippine White House Auto Supply, Inc. (PWHAS) for P430,000.00 without notifying or obtaining consent from L & R.
    • The deeds of sale were annotated at the back of TCT Nos. 197232 and 197233.
  • Foreclosure and Redemption
    • After default, L & R initiated extrajudicial foreclosure; on July 23, 1980 the properties were sold at public auction to L & R as sole bidder for P221,624.58.
    • On August 15, 1980, L & R learned of the PWHAS sale when it presented its certificate of sale for registration.
    • On March 10, 1981, PWHAS tendered P238,468.04 to L & R to redeem; L & R refused.
    • On March 31, 1981, PWHAS paid P240,798.94 to the Ex-Officio Sheriff; a certificate of redemption was issued to the Litonjuas.
  • Title Cancellation and Litigation
    • The Register of Deeds refused to annotate the certificate of redemption as an adverse claim.
    • On August 20, 1981, L & R caused cancellation of TCT Nos. 197232–197233 and issuance of TCT Nos. 280054–280055 in its name, free of encumbrance.
    • The Litonjuas and PWHAS filed a complaint for quieting of title, annulment of title and damages; the trial court dismissed, the Court of Appeals reversed, then reconsidered and set aside its reversal.

Issues:

  • Whether paragraph 8 (prohibition on alienation without consent) is valid and enforceable.
  • Whether paragraph 9 (right of first refusal) is valid and enforceable.
  • Whether the sale by the Litonjuas to PWHAS without consent is valid and enforceable.
  • Whether PWHAS, as successor-in-interest, had the right to redeem the foreclosed properties.
  • Whether the redemption made by PWHAS within one year is valid.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.