Title
Spouses Baes vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 108065
Decision Date
Jul 6, 1993
A landowner exchanged a canal-occupied lot for another, later claiming ownership of a filled creek bed. The Court ruled against double compensation, affirming fair exchange and denying unjust enrichment.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 108065)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Initial Acquisition and Canal Construction
    • In 1962, the government excavated a canal on private Lot 2958 (33,902 sqm) to improve the Tripa de Gallina creek.
    • Felix Baes acquired Lot 2958, registered under TCT No. 10990, then subdivided it into:
      • Lot 2958-A (28,889 sqm) – TCT No. 11041
      • Lot 2958-B (3,588 sqm) – TCT No. 11042 (entirely occupied by the canal)
      • Lot 2958-C (452 sqm) – TCT No. 11043
  • Deed of Exchange and Resurvey
    • On June 20, 1970, the government and Baes executed a Deed of Exchange: Lot 2958-B for government’s Lot 3271-A (3,588 sqm), later TCT No. 24300.
    • Soil from the canal filled the old creek bed. Baes petitioned (Jan. 12, 1968) for resurvey and subdivision of Lot 2958-C and part of Lot 2958-A, citing bearing and distance errors.
  • Issuance and Consolidation of New Titles
    • On January 15, 1968, the CFI of Pasay approved the resurvey-subdivision, canceling old TCTs and issuing:
      • Lot 1-A, Blk. 4 (672 sqm) – TCT No. T-14404
      • Lot 1-B (826 sqm) – TCT No. T-14405
      • Lot 2958-C-1 (452 sqm) – TCT No. T-14406
      • Lot 2958-C-2 (2,770 sqm) – TCT No. T-14407
    • Lots 2958-C-1 and 2958-C-2 were consolidated and re-subdivided into four lots:
      • Lot 1 (147 sqm) – TCT No. 29592
      • Lot 2 (950 sqm) – TCT No. 29593
      • Lot 3 (257 sqm) – TCT No. 29594
      • Lot 4 (1,868 sqm) – TCT No. 29595
  • Cancellation Proceedings
    • In 1978, the Republic petitioned to cancel TCT Nos. 14405 and 29592–29595, asserting Lot 1-B overlapped filled-up Lot 3611 and that Lot 2958-C had been unlawfully enlarged.
    • Baes did not oppose cancellation of TCT Nos. 29592, 29594, 29595; could not prove government used any portion of Lot 2 (TCT 29593). Trial court ordered cancellation of all contested titles, reinstating the original 452 sqm. parcel.

Issues:

  • Whether upon abandonment of the old creek bed by artificial diversion, petitioners automatically acquired ownership of the filled-up bed under Article 461 of the Civil Code.
  • Whether the June 20, 1970 Deed of Exchange constituted full and exclusive compensation, precluding any further claim by petitioners.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.