Title
Spouses Alvendia vs. Intermediate Appellate Court
Case
G.R. No. 72138
Decision Date
Jan 22, 1990
After failing to pay their debt, the Alvendias' offer to pay in cash is deemed unfair by the Supreme Court, resulting in the annulment of the Intermediate Appellate Court's resolutions and the order for Bonamy to return the difference between the execution price and the judgment debt.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 72138)

Facts:

  • Petitioners Felicidad M. Alvendia and Jesus F. Alvendia are involved in a case against the Intermediate Appellate Court (IAC) and others.
  • Bonifacio Bonamy initiated a collection suit on September 12, 1977, for P107,481.50 owed for unpaid construction materials.
  • A compromise agreement was approved by the trial court on January 6, 1978, but the Alvendias did not comply.
  • Bonamy sought execution of the judgment, resulting in a writ of execution issued on December 6, 1979.
  • The Alvendias' leasehold rights over a fishpond were sold due to their non-compliance.
  • Attempts to quash the writ and annul the sale were unsuccessful.
  • The IAC dismissed their petition on February 27, 1985, and denied their motion for reconsideration.
  • The case was escalated to the Supreme Court with consolidated petitions G.R. No. 72138 and G.R. No. 72373 filed on January 22, 1990.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court set aside the IAC's resolutions, allowing the Alvendias to pay the judgment debt in cash.
  • The Court upheld the IAC's dismissal of the Alvendias' petition and amended the writ of possession to correct errors in property descriptions.
  • Bonamy was ordered to return P12,518.50 to the Alvendias, representing the difference between the execution...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court highlighted the doctrine of finality of judgments, which is essential for public policy.
  • Once a judgment is executed, it cannot be reopened without adequate justification.
  • The Alvendias did not redeem their properties within the specified period, and their cash payment offer was made after the execution and redemption period had lapsed.
  • The Court noted that the Alvendias had multiple op...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.