Title
Soriano vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 148123
Decision Date
Jun 30, 2008
Rene Soriano convicted of homicide with frustrated homicide after eyewitness testimony overruled his alibi; Supreme Court upheld conviction.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 148123)

Facts:

Incident Details On December 29, 1994, at around 9:30 p.m. in San Carlos City, Pangasinan, petitioner Rene Soriano allegedly shot and killed Ernesto Amarillo and seriously wounded Soledad Ferrer. The prosecution charged Soriano with the complex crime of homicide with frustrated homicide.

Prosecution’s Case

  • Benjamin Cabansag, a tricycle driver and eyewitness, testified that Soriano fired shots randomly, hitting Amarillo and Ferrer, who were riding a motorbike. Amarillo died on the spot, while Ferrer survived but sustained severe injuries.
  • Police investigator Roger Doldol confirmed the crime scene, identifying Amarillo and Loreto Soriano (petitioner’s brother) as the dead. Ferrer was also confirmed as a victim.
  • Dr. Rachel Leyva-Uy, who conducted the autopsy on Amarillo, concluded that the fatal wound came from behind. Dr. Manuel Austria testified that Ferrer’s injuries rendered her unable to testify.

Defense’s Case

  • Soriano denied the charges, claiming he was stationed at Camp Boloan, Kalinga, Apayao, on the night of the incident. His alibi was corroborated by fellow army officers.
  • Defense witnesses Carmen Soriano and Luciano Soriano testified that Benjamin Cabansag was at a wake during the incident, casting doubt on his presence at the crime scene.

Issues:

  • Whether the prosecution proved Soriano’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
  • Whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the trial court’s conviction based on the credibility of the prosecution’s witness, Benjamin Cabansag.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.