Title
Solidum vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 192123
Decision Date
Mar 10, 2014
A child suffered severe injuries during surgery; Dr. Solidum was acquitted as negligence was unproven, res ipsa loquitur deemed inapplicable.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 192123)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Patient’s Background and Pre-Operative History
    • Gerald Albert Gercayo born on June 2, 1992 with imperforate anus; underwent colostomy at two days old.
    • On May 17, 1995 (age 3), admitted to Ospital ng Maynila for pull-through operation to restore anal opening.
  • Operative Team and Intraoperative Events
    • Surgical team led by Dr. Leandro Resurreccion; assisted by Drs. Luceño, Valeña, Tibio; anesthesiologists Drs. Abella, Razon, Solidum.
    • During surgery: Gerald developed bradycardia, went into coma (2 weeks), suffered hypoxic encephalopathy; resulted in permanent loss of sight, hearing, motor function.
    • Dispute over anesthetic administration: City Prosecutor alleged 100% halothane overdose; defense claimed only 1% halothane with pure oxygen delivered by anesthesia machine; attempted resuscitation with atropine, epinephrine, CPR; CT scan confirmed hypoxia.
  • Procedural History
    • Mother filed complaint for reckless imprudence resulting in serious physical injuries against attending physicians; information ultimately charged only Dr. Solidum.
    • RTC (Family Court) found Dr. Solidum guilty of reckless imprudence, sentenced to arresto mayor to prision correccional, ordered moral/exemplary damages jointly with hospital.
    • CA affirmed under doctrine of res ipsa loquitur; denied petitioner’s motion for reconsideration (May 7, 2010).
    • Dr. Solidum appealed by certiorari to the Supreme Court (G.R. No. 192123).

Issues:

  • Whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was properly applied to find negligence in the administration of anesthesia.
  • Whether Dr. Solidum was criminally liable for reckless imprudence resulting in serious physical injuries.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.