Title
Social Weather Stations, Inc. vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 208062
Decision Date
Apr 7, 2015
The Supreme Court affirms the validity of COMELEC Resolution No. 9674 but enjoins its enforcement against petitioners due to improper service and a flawed effectivity clause.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 208062)

Facts:

  • The case involves Social Weather Stations, Inc. (SWS) and Pulse Asia, Inc. as petitioners against the Commission on Elections (COMELEC).
  • COMELEC issued Resolution No. 9674 on April 23, 2013, requiring SWS and Pulse Asia to disclose the names of all commissioners and payors of surveys published from February 12, 2013, to April 23, 2013.
  • SWS and Pulse Asia are recognized firms conducting pre-election surveys.
  • SWS conducted a pre-election survey from February 15 to 17, 2013, regarding senatorial candidates and published the results.
  • Representative Tobias M. Tiangco requested COMELEC to compel SWS to disclose the identities of those who commissioned or subscribed to the survey.
  • COMELEC held a hearing on April 16, 2013, and subsequently issued Resolution No. 9674, mandating the disclosure of subscriber information.
  • SWS and Pulse Asia argued that the resolution exceeded the authority granted by the Fair Election Act and violated their rights to due process and non-impairment of contracts.
  • They filed a petition for certiorari and prohibition on July 26, 2013, challenging the resolution's validity and seeking a temporary restraining order.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court partially granted the petition, upholding the validity of Resolution No. 9674.
  • COMELEC was enjoined from prosecuting SWS and Pulse Asia for non-compliance regarding subscriber name submission.
  • The Court ruled that the requirement to disclose names is valid under the Fair Elect...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Court reasoned that disclosing subscriber names aligns with the Fair Election Act's goal of ensuring transparency and equal access to public service oppor...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.