Title
Social Security System Employees Association vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 85279
Decision Date
Jul 28, 1989
SSS employees staged an illegal strike; RTC upheld jurisdiction, ruling government employees lack strike rights under civil service laws.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 85279)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background
    • On June 9, 1987 the Social Security System Employees Association (SSSEA) and its officers and members staged a strike, barricading SSS premises and preventing work and transactions.
    • On June 11, 1987 the Social Security System (SSS) filed in the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 98, Quezon City, a complaint for damages and prayed for a writ of preliminary injunction to enjoin the strike, declare it illegal, order strikers back to work, and recover damages.
  • RTC Proceedings
    • June 11, 1987: The RTC issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) pending resolution of the injunction application.
    • Petitioners moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. On July 22, 1987, the RTC denied the motion, found the strike illegal, and converted the TRO into a preliminary injunction upon bond.
    • August 14, 1988: The RTC denied petitioners’ motion for reconsideration of the injunction order.
  • CA and Supreme Court Proceedings
    • Petitioners filed certiorari and prohibition with preliminary injunction before the Supreme Court (G.R. No. 79577). On October 21, 1987 the Court referred the case to the Court of Appeals (CA).
    • March 9, 1988: The CA in CA‐G.R. SP No. 13192 affirmed RTC jurisdiction and injunction. Motions to recall or reconsider were denied as moot by the Supreme Court.
    • February 6, 1989: The Supreme Court issued a TRO enjoining petitioners from further strike actions and kept the case submitted for decision on the petition to review the CA decision.

Issues:

  • Do employees of the Social Security System have the right to strike?
  • Does the Regional Trial Court have jurisdiction to enjoin the strike and order the striking employees to return to work?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.