Title
Smith, Bell and Co. vs. Natividad
Case
G.R. No. 15574
Decision Date
Sep 17, 1919
Smith, Bell & Co. sought Philippine registry for its vessel, Bato, but was denied under Act No. 2761, which restricts registry to corporations with wholly Filipino or U.S. ownership. The Supreme Court upheld the law, ruling it a valid exercise of police power to protect domestic commerce and national interests, denying the petition.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 15574)

Facts:

  • Parties and Vessel
    • Smith, Bell & Co. (Ltd.) is a Philippine corporation with a majority of British stockholders.
    • It owns the motor vessel “Bato,” built in the Philippines in 1916, over fifteen tons gross, intended for inter-island transport.
  • Procedural Background
    • The petitioner applied to the Collector of Customs at Cebu for a Philippine registry certificate.
    • The Collector refused because not all stockholders were citizens of the United States or the Philippine Islands.
    • Smith, Bell & Co. filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel issuance of the certificate.
  • Statutory Framework
    • U.S. Shipping Acts:
      • Act of April 29, 1908 (35 Stat. 70) authorizes the Philippine government to regulate inter-island commerce until U.S. Congress provides otherwise.
      • Jones Law of August 29, 1916 expands civil rights guarantees (due process, equal protection) and grants general legislative power to the Philippine Legislature.
    • Act No. 2761 (Feb. 23, 1918) amends the Administrative Code:
      • Sec. 1172 defines “domestic ownership” to include corporations wholly composed of U.S. or Philippine citizens.
      • Sec. 1176 empowers the Collector to inspect vessels and owners to ensure domestic ownership and legitimate trade.
      • Sec. 1202 limits foreign officers and crew on coastwise vessels and imposes a tonnage tax for noncompliance.

Issues:

  • Constitutional Authority
    • Can the Philippine Legislature validly enact Act No. 2761 under its delegated power from Congress?
    • Does denial of registry to corporations with alien stockholders exceed that power?
  • Due Process and Equal Protection
    • Does Act No. 2761 deprive Smith, Bell & Co. of property without due process?
    • Does the classification based on stockholder citizenship deny equal protection of the laws?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.