Case Digest (G.R. No. 145217) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
This case involves Pepito Sibuyo, the petitioner, against the People of the Philippines, the respondent. The events surrounding the case started on May 21, 1993, in the Municipality of Pasig, Metro Manila, where the petitioner was employed as a warehouseman at Philusa Corporation. The private complainant, Jocelyn Junio, was a labeler at the same company. Both parties had been friends for over ten years and occasionally worked together. On the day of the incident, Jocelyn experienced stomach pains and sought permission to rest in the salvage room where the petitioner worked.
Upon entering the salvage room, Jocelyn prepared a bed to rest. While she was lying down, she suddenly felt someone on top of her, kissing her neck and groping her breast. Despite her attempts to fend off the petitioner, he persisted in his advances, telling her to "just give in." Panic-stricken, Jocelyn managed to escape after loosening the nails of the backdoor, subsequently confiding her experi
Case Digest (G.R. No. 145217) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
Background of the Parties:- Petitioner Pepito Sibuyo and private complainant Jocelyn Junio were co-workers at Philusa Corporation in Pasig, Metro Manila.
- Jocelyn worked as a labeler in the non-liquid section, while Pepito was a warehouseman assigned to the salvaging section.
- The salvage room, where Pepito worked, contained a folding bed and a partition made of cartons, which employees sometimes used for rest during breaks.
The Incident:
- On May 21, 1993, Jocelyn experienced stomach pains and sought permission to rest. She decided to use the folding bed in the salvage room.
- While resting, she felt someone on top of her, kissing her neck and touching her breast. She saw it was Pepito and struggled to free herself.
- Pepito whispered, "Tayo lang dalawa, pagbigyan mo na ako." Jocelyn warned him to stop or she would kick him. Pepito eventually let her go.
- Jocelyn ran to the locker room, where she confided in a co-worker, Hilaria Franco, about the incident.
Aftermath:
- Pepito later called Jocelyn, saying, "Sinayang mo ang pagkakataon nating dalawa." Jocelyn cursed him and avoided him thereafter.
- Pepito confronted Jocelyn at work, cursing her and accusing her of spreading false rumors. This led to a commotion, prompting management to investigate.
- Jocelyn testified before the company's investigating committee, which found Pepito guilty of acts of indecency. He was subsequently terminated.
Legal Proceedings:
- Pepito filed a case for illegal dismissal with the Department of Labor and Employment, claiming Jocelyn's allegations were fabricated. The Labor Arbiter ruled in his favor, citing procedural lapses in his termination.
- Meanwhile, Jocelyn filed a criminal complaint for acts of lasciviousness against Pepito on December 13, 1993, seven months after the incident.
Issues:
- Whether the trial and appellate courts erred in finding no nefarious motive on Jocelyn's part in filing the criminal charge against Pepito.
- Whether the courts erred in giving credence to Jocelyn's testimony despite the seven-month delay in filing the criminal complaint.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)