Title
Shipside Inc. vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 143377
Decision Date
Feb 20, 2001
A 1958 land title dispute involving multiple sales, nullification, and revival of judgment; Supreme Court ruled action barred by prescription, favoring Shipside Incorporated.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 235725)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Procedural History
  • Shipside Incorporated (petitioner) seeks certiorari under Rule 65 against CA resolutions dated November 4, 1999 and May 23, 2000, which dismissed its petition for certiorari/prohibition and motion for reconsideration.
  • Respondents: Court of Appeals (Special Former Twelfth Division), RTC Branch 26 (San Fernando City, La Union), and the Republic of the Philippines.
  • Land Titles and Predecessor Transactions
  • October 29, 1958: OCT No. 0-381 issued to Rafael Galvez for four parcels (Lots 1–4) in San Fernando, La Union.
  • April 11, 1960: Galvez sold Lots 1 and 4 to Filipina Mamaril et al.; TCT No. T-4304 issued.
  • August 16, 1960: Purchasers sold Lots 1 and 4 to Lepanto Consolidated Mining Co.; TCT No. T-4314 issued.
  • October 28, 1963: Lepanto sold Lots 1 and 4 to Shipside; TCT No. T-5710 issued; Shipside exercised ownership.
  • Cancellation Order and Non-Execution
  • February 1, 1963: In LRC Case No. N-361, CFI La Union declared OCT No. 0-381 null and void; directed cancellation of OCT and subsequent titles.
  • January 25, 1965: CFI denied Galvez’s motion for reconsideration; August 14, 1973: CA affirmed; writ of execution issued April 22, 1974 but never implemented.
  • Revival Proceedings (Civil Case No. 6346)
  • April 21, 1999: OSG filed for revival of judgment and cancellation of Torrens titles in RTC Branch 26; impleaded Shipside and other successors-in-interest.
  • Shipside’s Motion to Dismiss (July 22, 1999) for: lack of cause of action (non-final judgment), non-real party, prescription, and 10-year limit for revival (Art. 1144(3), NCC).
  • RTC denied MTD (Aug 31, 1999) and MRC (Oct 14, 1999). Shipside filed CA petition (Oct 21, 1999), dismissed (Nov 4, 1999) for lack of proof of signatory’s authority; MRC denied (May 23, 2000).

Issues:

  • Corporate Authorization
  • Whether Lorenzo Balbin, as resident manager, needed express Board authorization to sign the CA petition’s verification and certification against forum-shopping.
  • Real Party and Prescription
  • Whether the Republic may pursue revival of judgment and invoke imprescriptibility after RC 7227 transferred Camp Wallace to BCDA.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.