Case Digest (G.R. No. 203833)
Facts:
- Mamerto T. Sevilla, Jr. and Renato R. So were candidates for Punong Barangay of Barangay Sucat, Muntinlupa City during the October 25, 2010 elections.
- Sevilla was proclaimed the winner with 7,354 votes, a margin of 628 votes over So's 6,726 votes.
- On November 4, 2010, So filed an election protest with the Muntinlupa City Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC), Branch 80, alleging electoral fraud and requested a manual revision of the ballots.
- The MeTC dismissed So's election protest on May 4, 2011, after a recount.
- So's motion for reconsideration was denied by the MeTC on May 17, 2011, as it was deemed a prohibited pleading.
- So filed a petition for certiorari with the Commission on Elections (Comelec) on May 31, 2011, alleging grave abuse of discretion by the MeTC Judge.
- The Comelec Second Division granted So's petition on May 14, 2012, and the Comelec en banc affirmed this ruling on October 6, 2012, by a 3-3 vote.
- Sevilla filed a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court to nullify the Comelec's resolutions.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court dismissed Sevilla's petition for certiorari.
- The case was remanded to ...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court held that the Comelec en banc's October 6, 2012 resolution lacked legal effect as it was not a majority decision required by the Constitution and the Comelec Rules of Procedure.
- Section 7, Article IX-A of the 1987 Philippine Constitution mandates that each Commission must decide by a majority vote of all its members.
- The Comelec Rules of Procedure similarly require a majority vote of all members for a valid decision.
- The equally divided 3-3 vote did not meet the majority requirement, rendering the resolution ineffective.
- In situations where t...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 203833)
Facts:
Mamerto T. Sevilla, Jr. and Renato R. So were candidates for the position of Punong Barangay of Barangay Sucat, Muntinlupa City during the October 25, 2010 Barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan Elections. On October 26, 2010, the Board of Election Tellers proclaimed Sevilla as the winner with a total of 7,354 votes, securing a winning margin of 628 votes over So's 6,726 votes. On November 4, 2010, So filed an election protest with the Muntinlupa City Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC), Branch 80, alleging electoral fraud, anomalies, and irregularities in all the protested precincts, and requested a manual revision of the ballots. Following a recount, the MeTC issued an Order on May 4, 2011, dismissing So's election protest. So filed a motion for reconsideration on May 9, 2011, which the MeTC denied on May 17, 2011, citing that the motion was a prohibited pleading. Subsequently, So filed a petition for certiorari with the Commission on Elections (Comelec) on May 31, 2011, alleging grave abuse of discretion by the MeTC Judge. The Comelec Second Division granted So's petition on May 14, 2012, and the Comelec en banc affirmed...