Case Digest (G.R. No. 167707)
Facts:
The Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, et al. v. Mayor Jose S. Yap, et al.; G.R. Nos. 167707 and 173775, October 08, 2008, the Supreme Court En Banc, Reyes, J., writing for the Court.Petitioners in G.R. No. 167707 are officials of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and related agencies; respondents-claimants are Mayor Jose S. Yap, Libertad Talapian, Mila Y. Sumndad, and Aniceto Yap and those similarly situated. In G.R. No. 173775 petitioners are Dr. Orlando Sacay, Wilfredo Gelito, and other Boracay landowners; respondents are DENR officials. The consolidated disputes concern whether present occupants of Boracay may secure Torrens titles over lands they occupy.
Chronology: In 1976 the DENR approved a National Reservation Survey of Boracay identifying occupied lots. In 1978 President Marcos issued Proclamation No. 1801 declaring Boracay a tourist zone and marine reserve administered by the Philippine Tourism Authority (PTA); the PTA later issued Circular No. 3‑82 (1982) to implement the proclamation. The occupants alleged they or their predecessors had been in open, continuous, exclusive and notorious possession since June 12, 1945 or earlier, declared their lands for taxation, and sought judicial confirmation of imperfect title under the public land laws.
Procedural history (G.R. No. 167707): Respondents-claimants filed a petition for declaratory relief in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Kalibo, Aklan, contending Proclamation No. 1801 and PTA Circular No. 3‑82 should not bar titling. The Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) answered that Boracay was an unclassified public domain, ipso facto public forest under PD No. 705 (Revised Forestry Code), and thus inalienable absent executive classification. The parties stipulated key facts and submitted memoranda. The RTC (Branch 5) ruled on July 14, 1999 that Proclamation No. 1801 and PTA Circular No. 3‑82 did not pose a legal obstacle to survey and titling; the OSG’s motion for reconsideration was denied. The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed on December 9, 2004. The Republic sought relief before the Supreme Court via a Rule 45 petition (certiorari) — G.R. No. 167707.
Procedural history (G.R. No. 173775): While G.R. No. 167707 was pending, on May 22, 2006 President Arroyo issued Proclamation No. 1064 classifying Boracay into 400 hectares of reserved forest and 628.96 hectares of agricultural (alienable and disposable) land and creating buffer zones. On August 10, 2006 certain Boracay landowners filed an original petition for prohibition, mandamus, and nullification of Proclamation No. 1064 (G.R. No. 173775), asserting prior vested rights and extensive investments. T...(Pro-only)
Issues:
- Do Proclamation No. 1801 and PTA Circular No. 3‑82 pose any legal obstacle to respondents’ acquisition of title to their occupied lands in Boracay (G.R. No. 167707)?
- At the time of the claimants’ established possession, were the areas they occupy in Boracay agricultural lands or public forest as defined by law (G.R. No. 173775)?
- Can the private occupants acquire prior vested rights of private ownership sufficient to seek judicial confirmation of imperfect title by mere continued possession without a prior positive government act classifying the land as alienable and disposable (G.R. No. 173775)?
- Is an executive declaration classifying land as alienable and disposable an indispensable prerequisite to obtain Torrens title under the Public Land Act (G.R. No. 173775)?
- Does Proclamation No. 1064 violate petitioners’ asserted prior vested rights, the Due Process Clause, or Section 4(a) of RA No. 6657 (Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law) (G.R. No. 173775)?
- May respondents be compelled by mandamus ...(Pro-only)
Ruling:
- (Pro-only)
Ratio:
- (Pro-only)
Doctrine:
- (Pro-only)