Case Digest (G.R. No. 121449)
Facts:
Sanyo Travel Corporation and/or Arthur Tan and Kelly Tan, petitioner, G.R. No. 121449, October 02, 1997, Supreme Court Second Division, Regalado, J., writing for the Court. The petition assails the April 25, 1995 decision and the August 10, 1995 resolution of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) (Third Division) that reversed a labor arbiter and found Florentino Haduca, respondent, illegally dismissed.Haduca was hired in November 1989 as a tourist bus driver in Sanyo Travel Corporation's Transportation Department and habitually slept at the company bus terminal in Makati. On the evening of January 2, 1992, a drunken brawl erupted on company premises involving several employees (including drivers Ernesto delos Reyes, Eduardo Tuazon and Fernando Ortega) and a security guard, Vito Adel. Haduca, then present at the drivers' quarters, was informed by a co-worker, Froilan Esteban, and went to the scene; he and others, including Kelly Tan (a company manager), followed Adel to the guardhouse and purportedly helped pacify him.
On January 3, 1992, Kelly Tan submitted an incident report to management. On January 8, 1992, Haduca, Tuazon and delos Reyes were ordered to report to Kelly Tan's office and were immediately terminated for "gross misconduct" due to their alleged involvement in the fracas; termination letters were signed by Arthur Tan, Sanyo's executive vice-president and CEO. They were then asked to submit written statements; Haduca complied the following day but was already barred from reporting to work. The company's security agency also submitted an incident report on January 9, and on January 17 Haduca signed a quitclaim releasing Sanyo from future money claims.
In February 1992, Haduca filed a complaint for illegal dismissal and money claims before the NLRC; hearings before the labor arbiter produced testimony from Haduca and Kelly Tan and introduced the incident reports. During pendency, Sanyo phased out its Transportation Department (August 1993). On June 1, 1994, Labor Arbiter Jesus N. Rodriguez dismissed Haduca's complaint, upholding the dismissal for serious misconduct. Haduca appealed to the NLRC, which on April 25, 1995 reversed the labor arbiter, declared the dismissal illegal for lack of just cause and lack of due process, ordered reinstatement with full back wages, and allowed recovery of monetary claims despite the quitclaim; the NLRC denied Sanyo's motion for reconsideration on August 10, 1995.
Petitioners filed a petition for certiorari (Rule 45) before the Supreme Court, asserting the NLRC committed grave abuse of discretion in rever...(Pro-only)
Issues:
- Did the NLRC commit grave abuse of discretion in reversing the labor arbiter's finding and declaring Haduca illegally dismissed?
- Was Haduca validly dismissed for serious misconduct arising from the January 2, 1992 altercation?
- Was Haduca afforded due process prior to termination as required by law?
- Is Haduca precluded from recovering monetary benefits by the quitclaim he signed and...(Pro-only)
Ruling:
- (Pro-only)
Ratio:
- (Pro-only)
Doctrine:
- (Pro-only)