Title
Santos Ventura Hocorma Foundation, Inc. vs. Mabalacat Institute, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 211563
Decision Date
Sep 29, 2021
SVHFI sued MII for unpaid rent and ejectment; SC ruled no forum shopping as cases had distinct causes of action, remanding for further proceedings.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 175057)

Facts:

  • Parties and Subject Property
    • Santos Ventura Hocorma Foundation, Inc. (SVHFI) is registered owner of Lot No. 530 (11,451 sq.m.) in Mabalacat, Pampanga (TCT No. T-195826-R).
    • Mabalacat Institute, Inc. (MII) (now Don Teodoro V. Santos Institute) occupied the lot from 1983 until March 14, 2002 by tolerance without rent.
  • Demand Letters and Refusal
    • March 14, 2002: SVHFI notified MII that, effective April 1, 2002, occupancy rent P50.00/sq.m. monthly was due; June 7, 2002: MII refused.
    • July 11, 2002: SVHFI demanded P2,519,220.00 for April–July 2002 or vacancy; MII still did not pay or vacate.
  • Collection Case Proceedings
    • SVHFI filed Civil Case No. 02-1326 for collection before RTC Makati Branch 150. MII moved to dismiss for lack of valid service; motions and reconsiderations denied by RTC (Orders of March 12 and September 25, 2003).
    • MII sought certiorari at CA (denied July 13, 2005; recon. denied September 16, 2005) and at the Supreme Court (dismissed July 4, 2005).
    • March 29, 2006: MII filed answer with compulsory counterclaim; admitted June 27, 2007. September 28, 2007: MII moved to dismiss for forum shopping and splitting of cause of action.
  • Ejectment Case Proceedings
    • June 20, 2006: SVHFI filed unlawful detainer (Civil Case No. 06-2568) in MCTC Mabalacat & Magalang.
    • March 31, 2008: RTC granted MII’s motion, dismissed Collection Case for forum shopping; October 6, 2008: Reconsideration denied.
    • CA affirmed on August 30, 2013; recon. denied February 26, 2014.
    • Both parties filed Rule 45 petitions; MII’s concern on counterclaim disposition denied April 21, 2014 and recon. denied July 9, 2014 (became final September 9, 2014).

Issues:

  • Whether SVHFI committed forum shopping by filing a collection case and an ejectment case in two different courts involving the same property.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.