Title
San Miguel Corporation vs. National Labor Relations Commission
Case
G.R. No. 96497
Decision Date
May 31, 1993
A driver for San Miguel Corporation files a complaint for illegal dismissal after being terminated without notice or hearing, leading to a court ruling in his favor and ordering his reinstatement and compensation.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 96497)

Facts:

  • San Miguel Corporation (SMC) hired Alfredo Angat as a driver and assigned him to Beer Sales Route No. 7 in San Fernando, Pampanga.
  • One of Angat's companions on the route was Monico Pamintuan.
  • On September 6, 1986, Pamintuan went missing after collecting from SMC's customers.
  • Angat reported the disappearance to SMC and requested an audit of the balance of beer in the truck.
  • Angat turned over the correct amount of money to SMC.
  • It was later discovered that the salesmen of Beer Route No. 7, including Angat, were involved in a scheme where they borrowed merchandise from SMC's customers and hid it by imputing it as actual orders.
  • Angat was grounded and ordered to report to SMC's Head Office.
  • He was charged with misappropriating company funds, which he denied.
  • During the investigation, Angat allegedly admitted to borrowing merchandise from SMC's customers.
  • Angat later discovered that his name was included in a list of persons prohibited from entering company premises.
  • He filed a complaint for illegal dismissal against SMC.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The court ruled in favor of Angat and declared his dismissal illegal.
  • SMC was ordered to reinstate Angat without loss of seniority rights...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • To validly dismiss an employee, an employer must meet two conditions: the dismissal must be for a cause provided for in the law, and the employee must be given notice and hearing.
  • The investigation conducted by SMC did not accord Angat the opportunity to present his defense or adduce evidence on his behalf.
  • The investigation was merely a fact-finding proceeding aimed at establishing guilt, and Angat was not appraised of the charges against him or given an opportunity to defend himself.
  • While the absence of notice and hearing does not automatic...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.