Title
San Miguel Corp. Supervisors and Exempt Union vs. Laguesma
Case
G.R. No. 110399
Decision Date
Aug 15, 1997
A union sought certification for supervisors and exempt employees across three San Miguel plants. The Supreme Court ruled they are not confidential employees and can form a single bargaining unit due to shared interests.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 110399)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Petition for Certification Election
    • On October 5, 1990, the San Miguel Corporation Supervisors and Exempt Union filed with DOLE a Petition for District Certification or Certification Election among supervisory and exempt employees of the SMC Magnolia Poultry Products Plants in Cabuyao, San Fernando, and Otis.
    • On December 19, 1990, Med-Arbiter Danilo L. Reynante ordered a single certification election covering all three plants as one bargaining unit.
  • Administrative and Judicial Proceedings
    • On January 18, 1991, San Miguel Corporation appealed, challenging the grouping of the three separate plants into one unit and the inclusion of supervisory levels 3 and 4 (confidential positions).
    • On July 23, 1991, Undersecretary Bienvenido E. Laguesma granted the appeal and remanded for proper classification of employees.
    • On September 3, 1991, upon union reconsideration, Undersecretary Laguesma directed separate elections for supervisors levels 1–4 and exempt employees in each plant.
    • On September 21, 1991, the company moved for reconsideration and to suspend proceedings.
    • On March 11, 1993, Undersecretary Laguesma issued an order, relying on Philips Industrial Development, Inc. v. NLRC, excluding supervisory levels 3 and 4 and exempt employees as confidential, thereby barring them from the certification election.

Issues:

  • Are supervisory employees levels 3 and 4 and the exempt employees “confidential employees” under the Labor Code, thus ineligible to join or form a labor union?
  • If they are not confidential employees, should the employees of the three Magnolia Poultry plants constitute one appropriate bargaining unit?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.