Case Digest (G.R. No. 223018) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
Petitioner Leonarda Jamago Salabe worked from August 1978 to February 1979 as a helper in the carinderia of Ana Macas at Jagna Public Market, Bohol. Ana Macas registered her with the Social Security System (SSS) under SS No. 06-0618084-5, after which Salabe continued as a voluntary member and remitted a total of 137 monthly contributions. Upon reaching age 60 in 1993, she filed for retirement benefits, which the SSS approved, granting her a monthly pension of ₱1,362.75 until July 2001, when her pension was abruptly cancelled. In March 2008, Marino Talictic, Officer-in-Charge of the SSS-Tagbilaran City Branch, informed her that her membership was void for lack of an employer-employee relationship between her and Ana Macas, nullifying all contributions. Salabe filed a petition with the Social Security Commission (SSC) on March 31, 2008. During the SSC’s clarificatory hearings, she testified and presented affidavits from disinterested witnesses (including Ana’s son Ceferino Macas a Case Digest (G.R. No. 223018) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Employment and Membership
- From August 1978 to February 1979, Leonarda Jamago Salabe worked as a helper in Ana Macas’s carinderia at Jagna Public Market, Bohol, and was registered under SSS No. 06-0618084-5.
- After separation, she continued as a voluntary member, paying 137 monthly contributions. Upon reaching age 60 in 1993, she applied for and received a monthly retirement pension of ₱1,362.75 until July 2001.
- Cancellation and Administrative Recourse
- In July 2001, SSS-Tagbilaran City Branch unilaterally terminated her pension. By letter dated March 24, 2008, Branch Head Marino Talictic declared her SSS membership cancelled for allegedly lacking an employer-employee relationship with Ana Macas.
- Petitioner filed a petition with the Social Security Commission (SSC) on March 31, 2008, seeking declaration of her bona fide membership and restoration of pension, supported by her own testimony and affidavits of witnesses.
- SSC and Court of Appeals Proceedings
- SSC dismissed her petition on June 6, 2012 for lack of proof of employment and ordered refund of benefits; motion for reconsideration was denied on June 10, 2013.
- Court of Appeals affirmed SSC rulings by Decision on December 1, 2014 and denied reconsideration on January 28, 2016, upholding cancellation for absence of employer-employee relationship and finding no due process violation.
Issues:
- Whether there was a valid employer-employee relationship between petitioner and Ana Macas to support SSS membership.
- Whether SSS complied with due process in cancelling petitioner’s membership and pension.
- Whether petitioner, having made 137 contributions and meeting age requirements, is entitled to retirement benefits under RA 1161 (as amended by PD 1636) and RA 8282.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)