Title
Supreme Court
Rural Bank of Lipa City, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 124535
Decision Date
Sep 28, 2001
Dispute over share transfer validity; Villanueva spouses retained stockholder rights due to incomplete transfer process under Corporation Code.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 124535)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Background
    • Petitioners: The Rural Bank of Lipa City, Inc., its officers and directors (Bernardo Bautista, Jaime Custodio, Octavio Katigbak, Francisco Custodio, Juanita Bautista)
    • Private Respondents: Reynaldo Villanueva, Sr., Avelina M. Villanueva, Catalino Villanueva, Andres Gonzales, Aurora Lacerna, Celso Laygo, Edgardo Reyes, Alejandra Tonogan, Elena Usi
  • Deed of Assignment and Debt Acknowledgment
    • February 5, 1993: Reynaldo Villanueva, Sr. assigns his 10,467 shares (including shares of eight other stockholders under his control) to the Bank’s directors.
    • November 10, 1993: Villanuevas acknowledge indebtedness of ₱4,000,000 to the Bank, to be paid from proceeds of real property sale.
  • Failure to Pay and Conversion of Shares
    • December 31, 1993 due date passes; Board demands surrender of stock certificates and additional collateral for ₱3,346,898.54 balance.
    • Villanuevas ignore demand; Bank converts their shares into treasury stock; Villanuevas challenge legality.
  • Stockholders’ Meeting and SEC Proceedings
    • January 15, 1994: Annual stockholders’ meeting (without notice to Villanuevas) elects new directors; Villanuevas file SEC petition for annulment, damages, and preliminary injunction (SEC Case No. 02-94-4683).
    • SEC Hearing Officer issues TRO (February 16, 1994) and later preliminarily enjoins new directors; SEC en banc on December 16, 1994 grants injunction; SEC orders upheld on reconsideration.
  • Certiorari Proceedings and CA Review
    • January 1995: Petitioners file certiorari vs. SEC Hearing Officer’s orders before SEC en banc (Case No. EB-440); SEC en banc denies relief (June 7 and September 29, 1995).
    • Court of Appeals (CA-G.R. SP No. 38861) dismisses petition for review (February 27, 1996) and denies reconsideration (March 29, 1996).

Issues:

  • Effectivity of Share Assignment
    • Whether Reynaldo and Avelina Villanueva’s Deed of Assignment effected a valid transfer of their shares absent endorsement and delivery of certificates.
  • Validity of SEC Injunctions and Stockholders’ Meeting
    • Whether the SEC Hearing Officer and en banc committed grave abuse of discretion in issuing TRO and preliminary injunction.
    • Whether the January 15, 1994 stockholders’ meeting and election of directors, held without notice to the Villanuevas, was valid.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.