Case Digest (G.R. No. 167714)
Facts:
Rowell Industrial Corporation v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 167714, March 7, 2007, Supreme Court Third Division, Chico‑Nazario, J., writing for the Court. Petitioner Rowell Industrial Corporation (RIC) is a manufacturer of tin cans; respondent Joel Taripe was employed by RIC as a rectangular power press machine operator beginning 8 November 1999 and was paid P223.50 per day until his alleged dismissal on 6 April 2000.On 17 February 2000 Taripe filed a complaint for regularization and payment of holiday pay and indemnity for a severed finger; the complaint was amended on 7 April 2000 to include illegal dismissal. Taripe alleged he was hired to perform functions normally performed by regular employees, was made to sign a document he did not fully understand as a condition of employment, and was summarily dismissed while his regularization claim was pending. RIC maintained Taripe was a contractual employee hired for the Christmas season and that his five‑month contract expired on 6 March 2000; RIC asserted it paid statutory benefits and that Taripe had indicated earlier that his prior departures from other employers were due to "finished contract."
The Labor Arbiter dismissed Taripe’s complaint on 29 September 2000, finding the employment contractual and awarding only compassionate monetary assistance and holiday pay. Taripe appealed to the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC). In a Resolution dated 7 June 2002 (affirmed in part and adjusted by the NLRC’s 20 August 2002 resolution), the NLRC reversed the Labor Arbiter, declared Taripe to be a regular employee, found his dismissal illegal, ordered reinstatement and full backwages (less P1,427.67) and adjusted attorney’s fees; it deleted the financial assistance award. RIC sought reconsideration before the NLRC, which was denied.
Petitioner RIC then filed a Petition for Certiorari under Rule 65 with the Court of Appeals, raising three assignments of error essentially challenging the NLRC’s interpretation of Article 280 of the Labor Code (as amended), the joint liability of RIC’s general manager Edwin Tang, and the computation of backwages. The Court of Appeals, in a decision dated 30 September 2004 (with a 1 April 2005 resolution denying reconsideration), affirmed the NLRC resolutions bu...(Pro-only)
Issues:
- Did the Court of Appeals misinterpret Article 280 of the Labor Code and applicable jurisprudence when it held that Joel Taripe was a regular employee and therefore illegally ...(Pro-only)
Ruling:
- (Pro-only)
Ratio:
- (Pro-only)
Doctrine:
- (Pro-only)