Case Digest (G.R. No. 9198)
Facts:
The Roman Catholic Bishop of Lipa v. The Municipality of San Jose, Batangas, G.R. No. 9198, August 29, 1914, the Supreme Court, Torres, J., writing for the Court.The plaintiff-appellee was the Roman Catholic Bishop of Lipa (representing the Catholic Church and, through it, the confraternity of the Lady of Consolation); the defendant-appellant was the Municipality of San Jose, Batangas, represented on appeal by the provincial fiscal. On September 29, 1911 counsel for the plaintiff filed a written complaint (amended November 9, 1911) alleging ownership in fee simple of two parcels called the “lands of the Virgin,” that the municipality was occupying them and had refused to return them despite demand, and that the detention caused P2,000 in damages; the complaint prayed for declaration of ownership, restitution of possession, damages and costs.
In its answer the municipal president admitted the first two paragraphs of the complaint but denied the remainder and asked for dismissal. After trial the court below (Hon. Mariano Cui, judge) rendered judgment on May 12, 1913, ordering the municipality to restore and deliver the two parcels to the plaintiff, denying the claim for damages, and making no special finding as to costs. The municipality sought a new trial; that motion was denied and exceptions were taken. The municipality then appealed by a bill of exceptions to the Supreme Court.
At trial the plaintiff offered two certificates from the provincial register of deeds showing possessory informations filed in the justice of the peace court and approved by order dated February 15, 1895 (Exhibits A and B), the informations having been recorded in the property registry; these documents were not objected to as false. The municipality produced no title or proof justifying its possession and asserted no legal basis for its occupation. The trial court found for the plaintiff. On appeal, the municipality argued inter alia that the trial court erred in recognizing the legal existence and capacity of the confraternity claimed to hold the lands and in treating the lands as church property.
The Supreme Court considered procedural objections (not raised below) and substantive proof. It examined the legal effect of possessory informations recorded in the registry, the impact of abandonment during the revolution, the relevance of Arti...(Subscriber-Only)
Issues:
- Procedural: May a defendant raise for the first time on appeal an exception to the complaint concerning the legal existence or capacity of the confraternity when no such exception was taken in the trial court?
- Substantive: Did the plaintiff prove title or at least a superior right of possession to the two parcels by virtue of the possessory informations recorded in the registry?
- Substantive: Could the confraternity (and the Church through its parish priest) validly hold the lands as property devoted to religious/pious uses so as to entitle th...(Subscriber-Only)
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)