Title
Reyes vs. Regional Trial Court of Makati, Branch 142
Case
G.R. No. 165744
Decision Date
Aug 11, 2008
A family dispute over the ownership of shares in Zenith Insurance Corporation leads to a jurisdictional battle as the Supreme Court rules that the Regional Trial Court does not have jurisdiction over the case due to the absence of an intra-corporate relationship and a purely civil nature of the controversy.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 165744)

Facts:

  • Oscar C. Reyes and Rodrigo C. Reyes are two of the four children of Pedro and Anastacia Reyes.
  • Pedro and Anastacia owned shares in Zenith Insurance Corporation, a family-established domestic corporation.
  • Pedro died in 1964, and Anastacia in 1993.
  • Pedro's estate was partitioned in the 1970s, but Anastacia's estate, including her Zenith shares, was not.
  • As of June 30, 1990, Anastacia owned 136,598 shares, Oscar owned 8,715,637 shares, and Rodrigo owned 4,250 shares.
  • On May 9, 2000, Zenith and Rodrigo filed a complaint with the SEC against Oscar.
  • The complaint alleged that Oscar fraudulently appropriated shares of the deceased spouses Pedro and Anastacia Reyes and sought an accounting of Zenith's funds and assets.
  • Oscar denied the allegations, claiming he purchased the shares with his own funds and questioned the SEC's jurisdiction, arguing the matter pertained to the settlement of Anastacia's estate.
  • With the enactment of Republic Act No. 8799, the case was transferred to the RTC of Makati, Branch 142, designated as a special commercial court.
  • Oscar filed a motion to declare the complaint a nuisance or harassment suit, which the RTC denied, recognizing only the derivative suit aspect of the complaint.
  • Oscar's petition to the CA to annul the RTC's order was denied, prompting him to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  1. The Supreme Court found the petition meritorious and ruled that the complaint is not a bona fide derivative suit but pertains to the settlement of the estate, which is outside the jurisdiction of the RTC acting as a special commercial court.
  2. ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court held that the RTC, sitting as a special commercial court, does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of Rodrigo's complaint.
  • The Court emphasized that jurisdiction is determined by the allegations in the complaint.
  • The complaint fail...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.