Title
Source: Supreme Court
Republic vs. Vda. de Neri
Case
G.R. No. 139588
Decision Date
Mar 4, 2004
Heirs of Neri sought land registration; Republic challenged title validity. SC ruled title void due to non-compliance with statutory requirements, reverting land to State.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 117416)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Subject Property
    • Lot 2821, Plan (LRC) SWO-150, Cagayan Cadastre 237, containing 105.5684 hectares along Cagayan de Oro River, Sitio Taguanao, Indahag, Cagayan de Oro City.
    • Certified alienable and disposable by Bureau of Forest Development on September 3, 1973.
  • Land Registration Case No. N-531 (Judicial Confirmation of Imperfect Title)
    • Filed July 24, 1974 by heirs of Graciano A. Neri, seeking registration under Commonwealth Act No. 141, as amended.
    • Application alleged ancestral and continuous possession, tax declarations, adjoining owners, and no known encumbrances; appended tracing plan, technical description, tax declarations.
    • Amended January 27, 1975; notice of initial hearing published and mailed to Director of Lands, Solicitor General, Bureau of Forest Development. No opposition filed.
    • Court declared general default, allowed ex parte evidence; decree issued February 5, 1976; Original Certificate of Title (OCT) No. 0662 issued September 26, 1976.
  • Civil Case No. 7514 (Annulment of Title and Reversion)
    • Filed January 5, 1981 by Republic of the Philippines (Director of Bureau of Lands) to annul OCT No. 0662 for lack of jurisdiction due to:
      • Failure to serve application on Director of Lands (Sec. 51, CA No. 141).
      • Failure to submit and secure re-verification/approval of Plan SWO-150 by Director of Lands (Secs. 2–3, P.D. No. 239).
    • Private respondents answered, contending service and plan-approval were procedural, not jurisdictional; alleged intervening prescriptive bar.
  • Procedural History to Supreme Court
    • Motion to intervene by 23 occupants (1985) denied; Supreme Court directed further hearing (G.R. No. 72218, 1986).
    • Parties agreed to decide on memoranda and documentary evidence; trial court dismissed complaint January 31, 1995, upholding OCT No. 0662 and presumption of regularity.
    • Court of Appeals affirmed April 29, 1999 and denied reconsideration.
    • Petition for review on certiorari filed before this Court, raising errors in summary judgment and presumption of jurisdictional acts.

Issues:

  • Jurisdiction and Presumptions
    • Whether the CA gravely erred in affirming CFI’s jurisdiction over person and property based on the presumptive regularity of official acts (Rule 131, Sec. 3).
  • Trial Without Full-Blown Hearing
    • Whether the CA gravely erred in upholding judgment rendered without a full trial and solely on pleadings and documentary exhibits.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.