Case Digest (G.R. No. 243133) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In G.R. No. 243133, decided on March 8, 2023 under the 1987 Constitution, the Republic of the Philippines, through the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG), Office of Senior Citizens Affairs (OSCA) and Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) (collectively, petitioners) sought review under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Misamis Oriental, Branch 17, Cagayan de Oro City. The respondent, Pryce Corporation, Inc., a domestic corporation engaged in the sale of memorial lots and provision of interment services, had filed on October 29, 2015 a special civil action for declaratory relief (Civil Case No. CV-ORD-2015-215) to clarify whether Section 4(a) of Republic Act No. 7432, as amended by RA 9257 and RA 9994, which grants a 20% discount on “funeral and burial services” to senior citizens, likewise applies to interment services. The petitioners moved to dismiss on the ground that the statute’s wording is plain and needs no interpretation; Case Digest (G.R. No. 243133) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Parties
- Petitioners: Republic of the Philippines, through the Office of the Solicitor General, Office of Senior Citizens Affairs (OSCA), and Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD)
- Respondent: Pryce Corporation, Inc., a domestic corporation engaged in selling memorial lots and offering interment services
- Procedural History
- On 29 October 2015, respondent filed a special civil action for declaratory relief (Civil Case No. CV-ORD-2015-215) before the RTC of Misamis Oriental, Cagayan de Oro City, seeking a ruling whether “interment services” are covered by the 20% senior citizen discount under Section 4(a) of RA 7432, as amended by RA 9257 and RA 9994.
- In its Resolution dated 18 January 2018, the RTC (Branch 17) found declaratory relief proper but ruled that the term “funeral and burial services” under the IRR of RA 9994 does not include interment services.
- The RTC denied petitioners’ motion for reconsideration in its 22 October 2018 Resolution.
- Petitioners filed a Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 before the Supreme Court, assailing the RTC Resolutions of 18 January 2018 and 22 October 2018.
Issues:
- Whether interment services are covered under Republic Act No. 7432, as amended by RA 9257 and RA 9994, and thus entitled to the 20% discount on funeral and burial services for the death of senior citizens.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)