Title
Supreme Court
Republic vs. Pasig Rizal Co., Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 213207
Decision Date
Feb 15, 2022
PRCI sought land title registration, proving 50+ years of possession, but SC remanded for stricter evidence on alienable status under RA 11573.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 213207)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Pre-Petition History
    • In 1958, Manuel Dee Ham caused the survey and approval of Plan Psu-169919 over the 944 sqm Subject Property in Barangay Caniogan, Pasig City, and was declared its tax owner.
    • Manuel died in 1961; his wife (Esperanza) and children inherited the lot and transferred beneficial ownership to Pasig Rizal Co., Inc. (PRCI), which thereafter paid the real property taxes.
    • On November 6, 2009, Esperanza executed an affidavit formalizing the transfer to PRCI.
  • RTC Proceedings (LRC Case No. N-11633)
    • In 2010, PRCI, through Esperanza as President, filed an application for original registration under PD 1529, alleging open, continuous, exclusive, and notorious possession since 1956 and lack of encumbrances or adverse claims.
    • After publication, the only party to enter appearance was the Republic of the Philippines; an order of general default was entered against all others.
    • PRCI presented ex parte: the approved survey plan, tax declarations and receipts (since 1956), Esperanza’s affidavit, DENR certifications (2011), and neighbor’s affidavit attesting to possession.
    • On December 1, 2011, the RTC rendered a decision confirming PRCI’s title, finding possession in the concept of an owner for the requisite period and directing issuance of the Decree of Registration.
  • Court of Appeals Proceedings (CA-G.R. CV No. 98531)
    • The Republic, via the OSG, appealed under Rule 41; on February 25, 2014, the CA affirmed the RTC, holding the Subject Property alienable and disposable based on:
      • A September 15, 2011 DENR FMB Certification of alienability; and
      • A March 18, 2013 DENR-NCR Certification validating the 2011 Certification under DENR AO 2012-09.
    • The CA also upheld the RTC’s findings on PRCI’s possession.
    • The CA denied the Republic’s Motion for Reconsideration on June 27, 2014.
  • Supreme Court Proceedings and RA 11573 Intervention
    • The Republic filed a Rule 45 petition on August 22, 2014, challenging only the proof of land classification status, not possession.
    • On August 3, 2021, the Court required memoranda and invited the LRA as amicus curiae. PRCI and the Republic filed memoranda on September 13, 2021.
    • PRCI argued that LC Map 639, plus the 2011 and 2013 DENR certifications, suffice to prove alienability under Malabanan and Spouses Modesto v. Urbina.
    • The Republic contended that per TAN Properties and Hanover, PRCI needed the DENR Secretary’s approved LC Map certified by the records custodian and live testimony of certifying officials.
    • Republic Act No. 11573 (effective September 1, 2021) amended PD 1529, shortening the possession requirement to 20 years and prescribing proof of alienability via DENR geodetic engineer certification.

Issues:

  • Whether PRCI established its right to registration under PD 1529 by proving acquisitive prescription or possession under existing laws.
  • Whether PRCI sufficiently proved that the Subject Property is alienable and disposable agricultural land of the public domain, particularly under the requirements of RA 11573.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.